Riley Julia, Ross Joy R, Rutter Dag, Wells Athol U, Goller Katherine, du Bois Ron, Welsh Ken
Department of Palliative Care, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK.
Support Care Cancer. 2006 Jan;14(1):56-64. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0843-2. Epub 2005 Jun 11.
The aims of this study were (1) to prospectively evaluate the clinical benefits of switching from morphine to an alternative opioid, using oxycodone as first-line alternative opioid, in patients with cancer, (2) to evaluate the consistency of the clinical decision for the need to switch by comparing two hospital sites, and (3) to evaluate whether there were objective predictors that would help identify morphine non-responders who require switching to an alternative opioid and from this to construct a clinical model to predict the need to switch.
One hundred eighty-six palliative care patients were prospectively recruited from two hospital sites. Responders were patients treated with morphine for more than 4 weeks with good analgesia and minimal side effects. Non-responders (switchers) were patients who had either uncontrolled pain or unacceptable side effects on morphine and therefore required an alternative opioid. The differentiation between responders and switchers was made clinically and later confirmed by objective parameters.
In this prospective study 74% (138/186) had a good response to morphine (responders). One patient was lost to follow up. Twenty-five percent (47/186) did not respond to morphine. These non-responders were switched to alternative opioids (switchers). Furthermore, of 186 patients, 37 achieved a successful outcome when switched to oxycodone and an additional 4 were well controlled when switched to more than one alternative opioid. Overall successful pain control with minimal side effects was achieved in 96% (179/186) of patients. There were no significant differences in the need to switch between the two hospital sites.
This study has shown that proactive clinical identification and management of patients that require opioid switching is reproducible in different clinical settings and significantly improves pain control. Further studies are required to develop and test the predictive model.
本研究的目的是:(1)前瞻性评估癌症患者从吗啡转换为替代阿片类药物(使用羟考酮作为一线替代阿片类药物)的临床益处;(2)通过比较两个医院地点,评估转换必要性的临床决策的一致性;(3)评估是否存在客观预测因素,有助于识别需要转换为替代阿片类药物的吗啡无反应者,并据此构建一个临床模型来预测转换的必要性。
从两个医院地点前瞻性招募了186名姑息治疗患者。反应者是接受吗啡治疗超过4周、镇痛效果良好且副作用最小的患者。无反应者(转换者)是指对吗啡有疼痛控制不佳或不可接受的副作用、因此需要替代阿片类药物的患者。反应者与转换者之间的区分是通过临床判断做出的,随后通过客观参数进行确认。
在这项前瞻性研究中,74%(138/186)的患者对吗啡反应良好(反应者)。1名患者失访。25%(47/186)的患者对吗啡无反应。这些无反应者被转换为替代阿片类药物(转换者)。此外,在186名患者中,37名患者转换为羟考酮后取得了成功的结果,另外4名患者转换为一种以上替代阿片类药物后疼痛得到了良好控制。96%(179/186)的患者总体上实现了疼痛的成功控制且副作用最小。两个医院地点之间在转换必要性方面没有显著差异。
本研究表明,在不同临床环境中,对需要阿片类药物转换的患者进行积极的临床识别和管理是可行的,并且显著改善了疼痛控制。需要进一步开展研究来开发和测试该预测模型。