Suppr超能文献

机械肌电图和加速度测量法对部分瘫痪志愿者肺功能的预测价值。

Predictive value of mechanomyography and accelerometry for pulmonary function in partially paralyzed volunteers.

作者信息

Eikermann M, Groeben H, Hüsing J, Peters J

机构信息

Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Mar;48(3):365-70. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.0326.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accelerometry (ACM) of adductor pollicis muscle has been used for monitoring of neuromuscular blockade but its validity compared with the gold standard, mechanomyography (MMG), has been questioned. During neuromuscular blockade we compared these methods and we assessed pulmonary function.

METHODS

In awake partially paralyzed volunteers we spirometrically assessed pulmonary function every 5 min until recovery. Rocuronium (0.01 mg kg(-1) + 2-10 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) was administered to maintain train-of-four (TOF)-ratios (assessed every 15 s) of approximately 0.5 and 0.8 over a period of more than 5 min. The TOF-ratio associated with 'acceptable' pulmonary recovery [forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced inspiratory volume in 1 s (FIV1) of > or =90% of baseline] was calculated using a linear regression model. During 5-min periods of repetitive nerve stimulation we compared the squared residuals of the FVC and FIV1 estimates from TOFACM vs. TOFMMG, and compared variance of values derived from ACM and MMG using Wilcoxon's test.

RESULTS

Limits of agreement of TOF-ratio derived from ACM and MMG were wide [0.15+/-0.016 (SD)], and variability of TOFACM exceeded that of TOFMMG[variance: 77+/-105 vs. 51+/-55% (P<0.01)]. Calculated TOF(ACM) and TOFMMG ratios of 0.56 (0.22-0.71) [mean (95%CI) and 0.6 (0.28-0.74)], respectively, predict 'acceptable' (90%) recovery of FVC while FIV1 remains impaired until TOF-ratios of 0.91 (0.82-1.07) and 0.95 (0.82-1.18), respectively. In turn, TOFMMG (TOFACM) of unity predicted 'acceptable' recovery of FVC and FIV1 in 94 (93) % and 68 (73) % of measurements, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerometry predicts effects of relaxation on pulmonary function as valid as the gold standard mechanomyography. We recommend that recovery of TOF ratio to 0.9-1.0 should be used as an indication of sufficient neuromuscular recovery in daily practice.

摘要

背景

拇内收肌加速度计(ACM)已用于监测神经肌肉阻滞,但与金标准肌机械图(MMG)相比,其有效性受到质疑。在神经肌肉阻滞期间,我们比较了这些方法并评估了肺功能。

方法

在清醒的部分麻痹志愿者中,每5分钟通过肺活量测定法评估一次肺功能,直至恢复。给予罗库溴铵(0.01 mg·kg⁻¹ + 2 - 10 μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹),在超过5分钟的时间内维持四个成串刺激(TOF)比率(每15秒评估一次)约为0.5和0.8。使用线性回归模型计算与“可接受的”肺恢复[用力肺活量(FVC)和第1秒用力吸气量(FIV1)≥基线的90%]相关的TOF比率。在5分钟的重复神经刺激期间,我们比较了TOFACM与TOFMMG对FVC和FIV1估计值的平方残差,并使用Wilcoxon检验比较了ACM和MMG得出的值的方差。

结果

ACM和MMG得出的TOF比率的一致性界限很宽[0.15±0.016(标准差)],TOFACM的变异性超过TOFMMG[方差:77±105%对51±55%(P<0.01)]。计算得出的TOF(ACM)和TOFMMG比率分别为0.56(0.22 - 0.71)[平均值(95%CI)]和0.6(0.28 - 0.74),可预测FVC的“可接受的”(90%)恢复,而FIV1在TOF比率分别达到0.91(0.82 - 1.07)和0.95(0.82 - 1.18)之前仍受损。反过来,TOFMMG(TOFACM)为1分别在94(93)%和68(73)%的测量中预测FVC和FIV1的“可接受的”恢复。

结论

加速度计预测松弛对肺功能的影响与金标准肌机械图一样有效。我们建议在日常实践中,将TOF比率恢复到0.9 - 1.0作为神经肌肉充分恢复的指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验