Rubin Mark A, Zerkowski Maciej P, Camp Robert L, Kuefer Rainer, Hofer Matthias D, Chinnaiyan Arul M, Rimm David L
Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Am J Pathol. 2004 Mar;164(3):831-40. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63171-9.
Despite years of discovery and attempts at validation, few molecular biomarkers achieve acceptance in the clinical setting. Tissue-based markers evaluated by immunohistochemistry suffer from a high degree of inter- and intraobserver variability. One recent advance in this field that promises to automate this process is the development of AQUA, a molecular-based method of quantitative assessment of protein expression. This system integrates a set of algorithms that allows for the rapid, automated, continuous, and quantitative analysis of tissue samples, including the separation of tumor from stromal elements and the subcellular localization of signals. This study uses the AQUA system to assess a recently described prostate cancer biomarker, alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase (AMACR), and to determine the effectiveness of the quantitative measurement of this marker as a means for making the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Using a prostate cancer progression tissue microarray containing a wide range of prostate tissues, AQUA was directly compared to standard immunohistochemical evaluation for AMACR protein expression using the p504s monoclonal antibody. Both methods produced similar results showing AMACR protein expression to be strongest in the clinically localized prostate cancer, followed by the metastatic tumor samples. Benign prostate tissue was categorized as negative for most tissue samples by immunohistochemistry. However, AMACR was detectable using the AQUA system at low levels using the standard 1:25 dilution but also at 1:250 dilution, which is not detectable by light microscopy. The AQUA system was also able to discriminate foamy gland prostate cancers, which are known to have a lower AMACR expression than typical acinar prostate cancers, from benign prostate tissue samples. Finally, a receiver-operating-characteristic curve was plotted to determine the specificity of the AMACR AQUA Z-score (normalized AQUA score) to predict that a given tissue microarray sample contains cancer. The area under the curve was calculated at 0.90 (P < 0.00001; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.95). At an AMACR AQUA Z-score score of -0.3, 91% of the 70 samples classified as prostate cancer were correctly categorized without the intervention of a pathologist reviewing the tissue microarray slide. In conclusion, the AQUA system provides a continuous measurement of AMACR on a wide range of prostate tissue samples. In the future, the AMACR AQUA Z-score may be useful in the automated screening and evaluation of prostate tissue biomarkers.
尽管经过多年的发现和验证尝试,但很少有分子生物标志物能在临床环境中被接受。通过免疫组织化学评估的基于组织的标志物存在高度的观察者间和观察者内变异性。该领域最近的一项有望使这一过程自动化的进展是AQUA的开发,这是一种基于分子的蛋白质表达定量评估方法。该系统集成了一组算法,可对组织样本进行快速、自动、连续和定量分析,包括将肿瘤与基质成分分离以及信号的亚细胞定位。本研究使用AQUA系统评估一种最近描述的前列腺癌生物标志物α-甲基酰基辅酶A消旋酶(AMACR),并确定对该标志物进行定量测量作为诊断前列腺癌手段的有效性。使用包含广泛前列腺组织的前列腺癌进展组织微阵列,将AQUA与使用p504s单克隆抗体对AMACR蛋白表达进行的标准免疫组织化学评估直接进行比较。两种方法产生了相似的结果,显示AMACR蛋白表达在临床局限性前列腺癌中最强,其次是转移瘤样本。通过免疫组织化学,大多数组织样本的良性前列腺组织被归类为阴性。然而,使用AQUA系统,在标准的1:25稀释度下可检测到低水平的AMACR,在1:250稀释度下也可检测到,而这在光学显微镜下是无法检测到的。AQUA系统还能够将已知AMACR表达低于典型腺泡前列腺癌的泡沫腺前列腺癌与良性前列腺组织样本区分开来。最后,绘制了一条受试者操作特征曲线,以确定AMACR AQUA Z评分(标准化AQUA评分)预测给定组织微阵列样本是否含有癌症的特异性。曲线下面积计算为0.90(P < 0.00001;95%可信区间,0.84至0.95)。在AMACR AQUA Z评分为-0.3时,70个被归类为前列腺癌的样本中有91%在没有病理学家查看组织微阵列玻片的干预下被正确分类。总之,AQUA系统可对广泛的前列腺组织样本中的AMACR进行连续测量。未来,AMACR AQUA Z评分可能有助于前列腺组织生物标志物的自动化筛查和评估。