Balogh I, Ørbaek P, Ohlsson K, Nordander C, Unge J, Winkel J, Hansson G-A
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, Lund SE-221 85, Sweden.
Appl Ergon. 2004 Jan;35(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2003.06.001.
This study compares questionnaire assessed physical activity with direct technical measurements among cleaners and office workers, stratified regarding age, gender and self-reported neck/shoulder complaints. During two full working days number of steps was recorded by a pedometer, sitting/standing positions by a posimeter and heart rate by a Sport-Tester. In addition the subjects kept a work task diary for 10 days. There were high intra-individual variations in exposure between the days. Subjects with complaints rated their exposure higher than those without, although they in fact showed lower direct measured exposure. This may imply underestimation of exposure-effect relationships. Rate of perceived exertion showed low correlation with heart rate ratio within the two occupational groups, but high, 0.64 when the two groups were combined. Age and complaints explained 31% of the variance for the cleaners.
本研究比较了清洁工和办公室职员中通过问卷调查评估的身体活动与直接技术测量结果,按年龄、性别和自我报告的颈部/肩部不适进行分层。在两个完整工作日期间,用计步器记录步数,用姿势计记录坐/站姿势,用运动测试仪记录心率。此外,受试者记录了10天的工作任务日记。不同日期之间个体内部的暴露情况存在很大差异。有不适症状的受试者对其暴露程度的评分高于无不适症状者,尽管实际上他们的直接测量暴露程度较低。这可能意味着对暴露-效应关系的低估。在两个职业组中,感知运动用力率与心率比的相关性较低,但两组合并时相关性较高,为0.64。年龄和不适症状解释了清洁工31%的差异。