Fukami Hironobu, Budd Ann F, Paulay Gustav, Solé-Cava Antonio, Allen Chen Chaolun, Iwao Kenji, Knowlton Nancy
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Naos Marine Laboratory, Box 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama.
Nature. 2004 Feb 26;427(6977):832-5. doi: 10.1038/nature02339.
Only 17% of 111 reef-building coral genera and none of the 18 coral families with reef-builders are considered endemic to the Atlantic, whereas the corresponding percentages for the Indo-west Pacific are 76% and 39%. These figures depend on the assumption that genera and families spanning the two provinces belong to the same lineages (that is, they are monophyletic). Here we show that this assumption is incorrect on the basis of analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Pervasive morphological convergence at the family level has obscured the evolutionary distinctiveness of Atlantic corals. Some Atlantic genera conventionally assigned to different families are more closely related to each other than they are to their respective Pacific 'congeners'. Nine of the 27 genera of reef-building Atlantic corals belong to this previously unrecognized lineage, which probably diverged over 34 million years ago. Although Pacific reefs have larger numbers of more narrowly distributed species, and therefore rank higher in biodiversity hotspot analyses, the deep evolutionary distinctiveness of many Atlantic corals should also be considered when setting conservation priorities.
在111个造礁珊瑚属中,只有17%被认为是大西洋特有的,而在18个包含造礁珊瑚的珊瑚科中,没有一个被认为是大西洋特有的,而印度洋 - 西太平洋地区的相应比例分别为76%和39%。这些数字基于这样一个假设,即跨越这两个区域的属和科属于同一谱系(也就是说,它们是单系的)。在此,我们基于对线粒体和核基因的分析表明,这个假设是错误的。在科的层面上普遍存在的形态趋同现象掩盖了大西洋珊瑚的进化独特性。一些传统上被归为不同科的大西洋属,它们彼此之间的亲缘关系比它们与各自太平洋“同属”的关系更为密切。27个大西洋造礁珊瑚属中有9个属于这个以前未被认识的谱系,这个谱系可能在3400多万年前就已经分化。尽管太平洋珊瑚礁拥有更多数量、分布范围更窄的物种,因此在生物多样性热点分析中的排名更高,但在确定保护重点时,也应考虑许多大西洋珊瑚深层次的进化独特性。