Shinohara Minoru, Scholz John P, Zatsiorsky Vladimir M, Latash Mark L
Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, CO 80309, Boulder, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jun;156(3):282-92. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1786-9. Epub 2004 Feb 19.
We addressed a hypothesis that changes in indices of finger interaction during maximal force production (MVC) tasks are accompanied by changed coordination of fingers in multi-finger accurate force production tasks. To modify relative involvement of extrinsic and intrinsic hand muscles, the subjects produced force by pressing either at their distal phalanges or at their proximal phalanges. As in earlier studies, in MVC trials, the elderly subjects showed a greater force decline when pressing at the proximal phalanges as compared to pressing at the distal phalanges. Two methods were applied to analyze finger coordination during the task of four-finger force production from zero to 30% of MVC over 5 s, at the level of finger forces (performance variables) and at the level of modes (control variables). Our previous observations of higher indices of variability during the ramp task in elderly subjects have been generalized to both sites of force application. An index of finger force covariation (the difference between the variance of the total force and the sum of the variances of individual finger forces) revealed small age related differences, which did not depend on the site of the force application. In contrast, analysis of covariation of force modes within the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) hypothesis showed much better stabilization of the time profile of the total force by young subjects. The UCM hypothesis was also used to test stabilization of the pronation/supination moment during the ramp task. Young subjects showed better moment stabilization than elderly. Age related differences in both force- and moment-stabilization effects were particularly strong during force application at the proximal phalanges. We conclude that the drop in MVC is accompanied in elderly subjects with worse coordination of control signals to fingers in multi-finger tasks. The UCM analysis was more powerful as compared to analysis of force variance profiles in revealing significant differences between the groups. This general result underscores the importance of efforts to analyze motor coordination using control rather than performance variables.
我们探讨了一个假设,即在最大力量产生(MVC)任务中手指相互作用指标的变化伴随着多手指精确力量产生任务中手指协调性的改变。为了改变外在和内在手部肌肉的相对参与度,受试者通过按压其远节指骨或近节指骨来产生力量。与早期研究一样,在MVC试验中,老年受试者在按压近节指骨时比按压远节指骨时力量下降更大。应用了两种方法来分析在5秒内从0到30%MVC的四指力量产生任务过程中的手指协调性,分别是在手指力量水平(性能变量)和模式水平(控制变量)。我们之前观察到老年受试者在斜坡任务中变异性指标较高,这一现象在两个力量施加部位都得到了验证。手指力量协变指数(总力量方差与各手指力量方差之和的差值)显示出与年龄相关的微小差异,且不依赖于力量施加部位。相比之下,在非控制流形(UCM)假设下对力量模式协变的分析表明,年轻受试者能更好地稳定总力量的时间曲线。UCM假设还被用于测试斜坡任务中旋前/旋后力矩的稳定性。年轻受试者的力矩稳定性比老年受试者更好。在近节指骨处施加力量时,年龄相关的力量和力矩稳定效应差异尤为明显。我们得出结论,在老年受试者中,MVC的下降伴随着多手指任务中控制信号与手指协调性变差。与力量方差曲线分析相比,UCM分析在揭示两组之间的显著差异方面更具效力。这一总体结果强调了使用控制变量而非性能变量来分析运动协调性的重要性。