Carter Yvonne M, Jablons David M, DuBois Jean B, Thomas Charles R
Section of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California-San Francisco School of Medicine, 2330 Post Street, Suite 920, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2003 Oct;12(4):1043-63. doi: 10.1016/s1055-3207(03)00089-9.
The cure rate of operable lung cancer and locally advanced head and neck cancer remains suboptimal, with a limited rate of local control despite improvements in the surgical removal of primary tumors and in methods for mediastinal lymph node dissection, in particular. The efficacy of adjuvant therapy, such as EBRT, has improved, and the immediate efficacy of new chemotherapeutic drugs is increasingly significant, although local recurrences remain frequent. Locoregional failure is not uncommon in upper aerodigestive tract cancers. Factors limiting radiocurability for locally advanced (stage III) lung cancer include mediastinal intolerance of irradiation (high risk of mediastinal fibrosis, which increases exponentially when levels of much more than 50 Gy are administered to the whole mediastinum) and the very high radiosensitivity of the healthy lung, which can develop fibrosis with relatively small or moderate doses starting at 18 to 20 Gy, and even more frequently when larger volumes are irradiated. Head and neck neoplasms are less difficult sites in which to administer doses of up to 70 Gy of external beam radiotherapy initially, but, like locoregionally recurrent lung cancers, they are not easily reirradiated with tumoricidal doses of EBRT. For these reasons, IORT seems to be a good option for increasing local control, because areas of [figure: see text] residual microscopic disease may be irradiated using IOERT approaches without affecting critical organs to the same extent. In addition, careful patient selection is paramount. Combined modality treatment regimens incorporating IORT may benefit patients with locally advanced disease. The ability of IORT to sterilize microscopic residual disease can enhance the "completeness" of resection and thus, theoretically, improve local control. Although distant disease dissemination remains by far the overriding issue, as newer effective agents emerge, local failure will continue to be a problem. Preliminary studies have demonstrated that IORT can be administered to patients who have locally advanced NSCLC and head and neck cancer, in the context of aggressive combined modality therapy, and is generally well tolerated. Long-term efficacy and benefit can only be determined in the setting of carefully designed clinical trials. (See the article by Thomas and Merrick elsewhere in this issue for further discussion of this topic.) Several relatively small, single-institution pilot studies exploring the utility and benefit of IORT for locally advanced upper aerodigestive tract cancers have been conducted. Clear conclusions have been difficult to determine because of the mixing of disease stages, varying degrees and completeness of surgical resection, varying radiation doses, different schemas, and other factors. Yet, given the major morbidity and mortality associated with locally recurrent lung cancer, methods of improving local control need to be pursued and refined. Encouraging preliminary data suggest that IOERT can be safely administered and may benefit local control. Based on several centers' expertise in the combined modality treatment of locally advanced lung cancer and familiarity with IORT, the UCSF Thoracic Oncology Program has proposed a multicenter phase 2 study incorporating IORT in a combined multimodality treatment schema for patients who have completely resected locally advanced stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC (nonpleural effusion, non-N3) (Fig. 1). It is hoped that this study will commence in the upcoming year.
可手术肺癌和局部晚期头颈癌的治愈率仍然不尽人意,尽管在原发性肿瘤的手术切除以及纵隔淋巴结清扫方法方面已有改进,但局部控制率仍然有限。辅助治疗(如体外放射治疗)的疗效有所提高,新化疗药物的近期疗效也日益显著,不过局部复发仍然很常见。上消化道癌症出现局部区域失败的情况并不罕见。限制局部晚期(III期)肺癌放射可治愈性的因素包括纵隔对放疗的耐受性(纵隔纤维化风险高,当对整个纵隔给予超过50 Gy的剂量时,风险呈指数级增加)以及健康肺组织的高放射敏感性,肺组织在18至20 Gy开始接受相对小剂量或中等剂量照射时就可能发生纤维化,当照射体积更大时更易出现。头颈肿瘤在最初给予高达70 Gy的外照射放疗剂量时难度较小,但与局部区域复发的肺癌一样,再次给予能杀灭肿瘤的体外放射治疗剂量并不容易。出于这些原因,术中放疗似乎是提高局部控制的一个不错选择,因为可以使用术中电子线放射治疗方法对残留微小病灶区域进行照射,而不会对关键器官造成同等程度的影响。此外,仔细选择患者至关重要。包含术中放疗的综合治疗方案可能使局部晚期疾病患者受益。术中放疗消除微小残留病灶的能力可提高切除的“完整性”,因此从理论上讲可改善局部控制。尽管远处疾病播散目前仍然是首要问题,但随着更新的有效药物出现,局部失败仍将是一个问题。初步研究表明,在积极的综合治疗背景下,术中放疗可应用于局部晚期非小细胞肺癌和头颈癌患者,且一般耐受性良好。长期疗效和益处只能在精心设计的临床试验中确定。(有关此主题的进一步讨论,请参阅本期其他地方Thomas和Merrick的文章。)已经开展了几项相对较小的单机构试点研究,探索术中放疗对局部晚期上消化道癌症的效用和益处。由于疾病分期的混杂、手术切除程度和完整性的不同、放射剂量的差异、不同的方案以及其他因素,难以得出明确结论。然而,鉴于局部复发肺癌相关的主要发病率和死亡率,需要寻求和完善改善局部控制的方法。令人鼓舞的初步数据表明,术中电子线放射治疗可以安全实施,可能有益于局部控制。基于多个中心在局部晚期肺癌综合治疗方面的专业知识以及对术中放疗的熟悉程度,加州大学旧金山分校胸科肿瘤项目提出了一项多中心2期研究,将术中放疗纳入针对已完全切除的局部晚期IIIA期和IIIB期非小细胞肺癌(无胸腔积液,无N3)患者的综合多模式治疗方案中(图1)。希望这项研究能在明年开始。