Suppr超能文献

对于先前未接受过放疗的局部复发性结直肠癌,采用术中电子线和外照射,联合或不联合5-氟尿嘧啶,并进行最大程度的手术切除。

Intraoperative electron and external beam irradiation with or without 5-fluorouracil and maximum surgical resection for previously unirradiated, locally recurrent colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Gunderson L L, Nelson H, Martenson J A, Cha S, Haddock M, Devine R, Fieck J M, Wolff B, Dozois R, O'Connell M J

机构信息

Division of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Dec;39(12):1379-95. doi: 10.1007/BF02054527.

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: 1) Disease control and survival will be evaluated for treatment regimens containing intraoperative electron irradiation (IOERT) for locally recurrent, previously unirradiated colorectal cancers. 2) Various prognostic factors will be evaluated to determine whether they have an impact on disease control or survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 1981 through August 1995, 123 patients with previously unirradiated locally recurrent colorectal cancers received IOERT at our institution, usually as a supplement to external beam irradiation (EBRT) and maximum resection. All received EBRT with or without concomitant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Forty-five Gy in 25 fractions was given to the tumor or tumor bed plus 3-cm to 5-cm margins in 121 of 123 patients and a boost of 5.4 to 9 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions to the tumor plus 2-cm margins. Maximum resection was performed before or after EBRT. IOERT doses ranged from 10 to 20 Gy in 119 of 123 patients, with dose dependent on resection margins (130 fields in 123 patients). Maintenance chemotherapy was given to only two patients.

RESULTS

Disease relapse and survival were evaluated. Central failure (within the IOERT field) was documented in 13 of 123 patients (11 percent) with a five-year actuarial rate of 26 percent. Local relapse (in EBRT field) occurred in 24 patients (20 percent); five-year rate was 37 percent. Distant metastases occurred in 66 patients (54 percent); five-year rate was 72 percent. Median survival was 28 months, with overall survival at two, three, and five years of 62, 39, and 20 percent, respectively. Tolerance data suggest a relationship between IOERT dose and incidence of Grade 2 or 3 neuropathy (< or = 12.5 Gy, 2 of 29 or 7 percent; > or = 15 Gy, 19 of 101 or 19 percent; P = 0.12). Survival and disease control were analyzed as a function of potential prognostic factors. None of the prognostic factors had a significant impact on disease control or survival. Although there was a trend for reduction in local relapse rates with gross total vs. partial resection, this neither achieved statistical significance nor translated into improved survival. Patients with gross residual disease after maximum resection had three-year and five-year survival rates of 36 and 18 percent, respectively, which paralleled results for patients with gross total resection at 41 and 24 percent, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Encouraging trends for improved local control with or without survival exist in separate locally recurrent colorectal IOERT analyses from our institution and other institutions. Therefore, continued evaluation of IOERT approaches seems warranted. Disease control within the IOERT and external fields is decreased when the surgeon is unable to accomplish a gross total resection. Therefore, it is reasonable to consistently add 5-fluorouracil or other dose modifiers during EBRT and to evaluate the use of dose modifiers in conjunction with IOERT (sensitizers and hyperthermia). In view of high systemic failure rates of > 50 percent in patients with locally recurrent disease, more routine use of systemic therapy is indicated as a component of IOERT-containing treatment regimens (use existent chemotherapy and/or develop effective immunotherapy and gene transfer therapy). Even with locally recurrent lesions, the aggressive multimodality approaches including IOERT have resulted in improved local control and long-term survival rates of 20 percent vs. an expected 5 percent with conventional techniques.

摘要

目的/目标:1)评估含术中电子线照射(IOERT)的治疗方案对局部复发、既往未接受过放疗的结直肠癌的疾病控制情况和生存率。2)评估各种预后因素,以确定它们是否对疾病控制或生存率有影响。

材料与方法

1981年4月至1995年8月,123例既往未接受过放疗的局部复发结直肠癌患者在本机构接受了IOERT治疗,通常作为外照射(EBRT)和最大程度切除的补充。所有患者均接受了EBRT,部分患者同时接受了以5-氟尿嘧啶为基础的化疗。123例患者中的121例,对肿瘤或肿瘤床加3厘米至5厘米的边缘给予25次分割共45 Gy的照射,对肿瘤加2厘米边缘给予3至5次分割共5.4至9 Gy的追加剂量。最大程度切除在EBRT之前或之后进行。123例患者中的119例IOERT剂量为10至20 Gy,剂量取决于切除边缘(123例患者共130个照射野)。仅2例患者接受了维持化疗。

结果

对疾病复发和生存率进行了评估。123例患者中有13例(11%)记录有中心野失败(在IOERT照射野内),5年精算发生率为26%。局部复发(在EBRT照射野内)发生在24例患者(20%);5年发生率为37%。远处转移发生在66例患者(54%);5年发生率为72%。中位生存期为28个月,2年、3年和5年的总生存率分别为62%、39%和20%。耐受性数据表明IOERT剂量与2级或3级神经病变的发生率之间存在关联(≤12.5 Gy,29例中有2例或7%;≥15 Gy,101例中有19例或19%;P = 0.12)。将生存率和疾病控制情况作为潜在预后因素的函数进行分析。没有一个预后因素对疾病控制或生存率有显著影响。尽管肉眼全切与部分切除相比局部复发率有降低趋势,但这既未达到统计学显著性,也未转化为生存率的提高。最大程度切除后有肉眼残留病灶的患者3年和5年生存率分别为36%和18%,与肉眼全切患者的结果分别为41%和24%相似。

结论

在本机构和其他机构对局部复发结直肠癌进行的单独IOERT分析中,存在局部控制改善(无论生存率是否提高)的令人鼓舞的趋势。因此,似乎有必要继续评估IOERT方法。当外科医生无法完成肉眼全切时,IOERT野和外照射野内的疾病控制会降低。因此,在EBRT期间持续添加5-氟尿嘧啶或其他剂量调节剂,并评估剂量调节剂与IOERT联合使用(增敏剂和热疗)是合理的。鉴于局部复发疾病患者的全身失败率>50%,更多常规使用全身治疗作为含IOERT治疗方案的一部分是必要的(使用现有的化疗和/或开发有效的免疫治疗和基因转移治疗)。即使是局部复发病变,包括IOERT在内的积极多模式方法也已使局部控制得到改善,长期生存率达到20%,而传统技术预期为5%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验