Talley J D, Smith S M, Walton-Shirley M, Hattel L, Szabo T, Godlewski K, Stahr L, Yussman Z, Palmer S, Vogel R
Cardiovascular Division, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Kentucky 40202.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992 May;26(1):55-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810260113.
To determine the utility of 4.1 French (F) catheters in diagnosing coronary artery disease, 50 patients were randomized to 4.1F Multipurpose or Judkins catheters utilizing the percutaneous right brachial approach. The randomized 4.1F tip shape catheter completed the procedure in 40% of the patients, and overall the 4.1F catheters completed the catheterization in 72% of the cases. With excessive or prolonged manipulation, the catheters were noted to kink and soften and required replacement for a catheter of similar or larger size. In 28% of the cases, larger F sizes (5F and 6F) were used to complete the procedure. There was 1 (2%) procedural complication. The total procedural success (accounting for all F sizes) without clinical complication was 98%. There was no difference between the 4.1F Judkins or Multipurpose catheter shapes for coronary arteriography by either qualitative or quantitative angiographic analysis. Left ventricular opacification was improved with the 4.1F Pigtail vs. the 4.1 Multipurpose by qualitative angiographic analysis. When the 4.1F angiograms were compared by quantitative angiography in blinded, but not randomized fashion to angiograms performed with 6F Judkins catheters, there was improved opacification of the LAD and diastolic frame of the left ventriculogram with the larger catheter. This difference was not noted with qualitative angiography. This study indicates that 4.1F catheters can be utilized from the right brachial approach for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, thus avoiding the need for supine bedrest associated with routine femoral artery catheterization while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.
为确定4.1法国(F)导管在诊断冠状动脉疾病中的效用,50例患者采用经皮右肱动脉途径随机分为使用4.1F多用途导管组或Judkins导管组。随机分组的4.1F尖端形状导管在40%的患者中完成了操作,总体而言,4.1F导管在72%的病例中完成了导管插入术。在操作过度或时间过长时,发现导管会扭结和变软,需要更换为尺寸相似或更大的导管。在28%的病例中,使用了更大F尺寸(5F和6F)的导管来完成操作。有1例(2%)操作并发症。无临床并发症的总操作成功率(考虑所有F尺寸)为98%。通过定性或定量血管造影分析,4.1F Judkins导管或多用途导管形状在冠状动脉造影方面无差异。通过定性血管造影分析,4.1F猪尾导管与4.1多用途导管相比,左心室显影有所改善。当以盲法但非随机方式将4.1F血管造影与使用6F Judkins导管进行的血管造影进行定量血管造影比较时,较大导管使左前降支(LAD)显影和左心室舒张期图像的显影得到改善。定性血管造影未发现这种差异。本研究表明,4.1F导管可从右肱动脉途径用于诊断冠状动脉疾病,从而避免了与常规股动脉导管插入术相关的仰卧位卧床休息的需要,同时保持诊断准确性。