Wong Humberto, Gotway Michael B, Sasson A Daniel, Jeffrey R Brooke
Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif, USA.
Radiology. 2004 Apr;231(1):185-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2311021776.
To evaluate periaortic hematoma (PH) near the level of the diaphragm at abdominal computed tomography (CT) as an indirect sign of acute traumatic aortic injury after blunt trauma in patients with mediastinal hematoma.
From 1998 to 2001, 97 patients with CT evidence of mediastinal hematoma after blunt thoracic trauma were retrospectively identified at two level 1 trauma centers. The presence or absence of PH near the level of the diaphragmatic crura was retrospectively established by a blinded reviewer at each institution. Aortic injury status was determined by reviewing angiographic, surgical, and clinical records. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative productive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated.
Among the 97 patients with mediastinal hematoma, 14 had both PH near the level of the diaphragm and aortic injury; six had aortic injuries without PH, five had PH near the level of the diaphragm without aortic injury, and 72 had no evidence of PH near the diaphragm and no aortic injury. Sensitivity for PH near the level of the diaphragm as a sign of aortic injury was 70%; specificity, 94%; positive predictive value, 74%; and negative predictive value, 92%. The positive likelihood ratio for the presence of aortic injury was 10.8, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.3.
PH near the level of the diaphragmatic crura is an insensitive but relatively specific sign for aortic injury after blunt trauma. The presence of this sign at abdominal CT should prompt imaging of the thoracic aorta to evaluate potential thoracic aortic injury.
评估腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)显示的膈水平附近的主动脉周围血肿(PH),作为钝性创伤后纵隔血肿患者急性创伤性主动脉损伤的间接征象。
回顾性分析1998年至2001年期间,在两家一级创伤中心确诊的97例钝性胸部创伤后有CT证据显示纵隔血肿的患者。由各机构的一名不知情的阅片者回顾性确定膈脚水平附近是否存在PH。通过查阅血管造影、手术和临床记录来确定主动脉损伤情况。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及阳性和阴性似然比。
在97例纵隔血肿患者中,14例膈水平附近既有PH又有主动脉损伤;6例有主动脉损伤但无PH;5例膈水平附近有PH但无主动脉损伤;72例膈水平附近无PH证据且无主动脉损伤。膈水平附近的PH作为主动脉损伤征象的敏感性为70%;特异性为94%;阳性预测值为74%;阴性预测值为92%。主动脉损伤存在的阳性似然比为10.8,阴性似然比为0.3。
膈脚水平附近的PH是钝性创伤后主动脉损伤的一个不敏感但相对特异的征象。腹部CT出现此征象应促使对胸主动脉进行成像,以评估潜在的胸主动脉损伤。