Harris John H, Harris William H, Jain Sanjay, Ferguson A Y, Hill David A, Trahan Amy M
Department of Radiology, University of Texas McGovern School of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
, Seminole, USA.
Emerg Radiol. 2018 Aug;25(4):387-391. doi: 10.1007/s10140-018-1596-9. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
CTA is routinely ordered on level II blunt thoraco-abdominally injured patients for assessment of injury to the thoracic aorta. The vast majority of such assessments are negative. The question being asked is, Does the accurate interpretation of the three mediastinal signs permit reliable determination of which patients need CTA for aortic assessment? The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the role of three specifically selected mediastinal anatomic signs on the initial supine chest radiograph (CXR) of adult level II blunt thoraco-abdominally injured patients for the presence or absence of a mediastinal hematoma. The presence of a mediastinal hematoma is typically used as an indicator for computed tomographic angiography (CTA). The three mediastinal signs are the right para-tracheal stripe (RPTS), left para-spinal line (LPSL), and the left apical extra-pleural area (LAPA).
The patient triage designation (level II trauma) was made by the attending physician at the time of admission. The initial CXR image and the CTA report of the 197 adult blunt level II thoraco-abdominally injured patients obtained on the day of admission were compared. The CXR of each of the 197 patients was independently assessed by each of four observers specifically for the status of the three mediastinal signs. Each observer was blinded to the CTA report until after the status of the three mediastinal sign evaluation had been determined. Two or three of the mediastinal signs being positive were required to determine that the CXR was positive for a mediastinal hematoma.
Two or three of the selected mediastinal signs were normal in 192 (97.5%) patients. None of these patients had either a mediastinal hematoma or a major aortic injury on CTA. In each of the remaining five (2.5%) patients, two or three of the mediastinal signs were abnormal. Each of these patients had a mediastinal hematoma and a major thoracic aortic injury on CTA.
This preliminary study suggests that the accurate interpretation of the three specifically selected mediastinal signs on the initial supine CXR of adult level II blunt thoraco-abdominally injured patients could reduce the need for routine CTA for thoracic aortic injury assessment, and requires verification by an additional study.
对于Ⅱ级钝性胸腹联合伤患者,通常会进行CT血管造影(CTA)以评估胸主动脉损伤情况。此类评估绝大多数为阴性。目前的问题是,对三种纵隔征象的准确解读能否可靠地确定哪些患者需要进行CTA以评估主动脉情况?本研究的目的是评估在成年Ⅱ级钝性胸腹联合伤患者的初始仰卧位胸部X线片(CXR)上,三种特定选择的纵隔解剖学征象对于纵隔血肿存在与否的作用。纵隔血肿的存在通常被用作计算机断层血管造影(CTA)的指标。这三种纵隔征象分别是右气管旁条纹(RPTS)、左脊柱旁线(LPSL)和左肺尖胸膜外区域(LAPA)。
患者的分诊级别(Ⅱ级创伤)由主治医生在入院时确定。比较了197例成年Ⅱ级钝性胸腹联合伤患者入院当天获得其初始CXR图像和CTA报告。197例患者中的每例患者的CXR均由四名观察者分别独立评估,专门针对三种纵隔征象的情况。在确定三种纵隔征象评估情况之前,每位观察者对CTA报告均不知情。需要两种或三种纵隔征象为阳性才能确定CXR显示纵隔血肿阳性。
192例(97.5%)患者的两种或三种选定纵隔征象正常。这些患者在CTA检查中均未发现纵隔血肿或主动脉严重损伤。其余五例(2.5%)患者中,每例患者的两种或三种纵隔征象均异常。这些患者在CTA检查中均发现纵隔血肿和胸主动脉严重损伤。
这项初步研究表明,对成年Ⅱ级钝性胸腹联合伤患者初始仰卧位CXR上三种特定选择的纵隔征象的准确解读,可能会减少对胸主动脉损伤评估进行常规CTA检查的必要性,这需要进一步的研究加以验证。