Saunders Jason R, Williams Norman S, Eccersley A James P
Academic Department of Surgery, Barts and The Royal London Hospital, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Mar;47(3):354-63; discussion 363-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-003-0061-2.
Patients undergoing total anorectal reconstruction for anorectal atresia or following abdominoperineal resection of the rectum do not fare as well after an electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter as patients with incontinence alone. This retrospective study reports the outcome for the combination of a continent colonic conduit or antegrade continence enema procedure with an electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter in patients with atresia or following an abdominoperineal resection of the rectum as part of total anorectal reconstruction to overcome combined incontinence and evacuatory dysfunction.
Between September 1994 and September 1999, 11 continent colonic conduits were fashioned in 11 patients with an electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter as part of total anorectal reconstruction for end-stage fecal incontinence. In addition, three patients had an antegrade continence enema procedure in situ, one of which was converted to a colonic conduit at a later stage. Five patients had a colonic conduit fashioned subsequent to an electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter, four had both procedures in a combined operation, and five had a conduit formed before an electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter (including the three with an antegrade continence enema procedure).
Median follow-up was 53 (range, 7-98) months until July 2002 or until exit from this study group because of end stoma formation (n = 6). Seven patients (50 percent) had a successful outcome, defined as continent to solid and liquid stool. Overall, eight patients (57 percent) reported some degree of improvement in their bowel function and were successfully managed by this combination of procedures. An end stoma was formed in six patients (43 percent).
The combination of antegrade irrigation via a colonic conduit or an antegrade continence enema procedure provides a successful outcome for some patients when incorporated into total anorectal reconstruction, provided that sepsis does not occur, thus avoiding permanent stoma formation. The combination of these procedures may represent an improvement in total anorectal reconstruction and warrants further clinical trial.
因肛门直肠闭锁接受全肛门直肠重建术或直肠经腹会阴切除术后的患者,使用电刺激股薄肌新肛门括约肌后的效果不如单纯失禁患者。这项回顾性研究报告了在全肛门直肠重建中,对于肛门闭锁或直肠经腹会阴切除术后的患者,采用可控结肠造口术或顺行性节制灌肠术联合电刺激股薄肌新肛门括约肌,以克服大小便失禁和排便功能障碍的综合问题的结果。
1994年9月至1999年9月期间,11例患者接受了全肛门直肠重建术,其中包括为终末期大便失禁患者制作11个可控结肠造口,并植入电刺激股薄肌新肛门括约肌。此外,3例患者原位接受了顺行性节制灌肠术,其中1例后来改为结肠造口术。5例患者在植入电刺激股薄肌新肛门括约肌后制作了结肠造口,4例患者在联合手术中同时进行了这两种手术,5例患者在植入电刺激股薄肌新肛门括约肌之前制作了造口(包括3例接受顺行性节制灌肠术的患者)。
截至2002年7月,或因形成永久性造口(n = 6)退出本研究组,中位随访时间为53(范围7 - 98)个月。7例患者(50%)取得了成功的结果,即对固体和液体粪便均能控制。总体而言,8例患者(57%)报告其肠道功能有一定程度的改善,并通过这种联合手术得到了成功治疗。6例患者(43%)形成了永久性造口。
当纳入全肛门直肠重建时,通过结肠造口进行顺行性冲洗或顺行性节制灌肠术,对于一些患者可取得成功的结果,前提是不发生败血症,从而避免形成永久性造口。这些手术的联合应用可能代表了全肛门直肠重建的一种改进,值得进一步进行临床试验。