Morgan Jeffrey A, John Ranjit, Lee Brian J, Oz Mehmet C, Naka Yoshifumi
Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Mar;77(3):859-63. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.09.048.
Bridging to transplant with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) can be limited by severe right ventricular failure (RVF). The focus of this study was to ascertain whether early implantation (< 24 hours) of a right ventricular assist device (RVAD) in patients with severe RVF improved survival and whether severe RVF adversely affected post-transplant survival.
We conducted a 10-year review of our bridge to transplant experience using the Heartmate device (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA, USA), studying patients who required an Abiomed RVAD (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA).
There were 243 patients who underwent LVAD implantation, of which 17 (7.0%) required an RVAD. Ten patients underwent early RVAD insertion (< 24 hours) while 7 underwent delayed insertion (> 24 hours). Bridging to transplant was successful in 11 (64.7%) RVAD patients versus 163 (72.1%) non-RVAD patients (p = 0.046). Of the 10 patients who underwent early RVAD insertion, 7 (70.0%) were successfully bridged. Of the 7 patients who underwent delayed RVAD insertion, 4 (57.1%) were successfully bridged (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in post-transplant 1, 5, and 10-year survival between RVAD and non-RVAD patients (71.4%, 71.4%, and 71.4% for RVAD patients, vs 90.5%, 80.4%, and 78.5%, respectively, for non-RVAD patients; p = 0.366). Pretransplant RVAD support was not a risk factor for post-transplant mortality (p = 0.864).
Severe RVF adversely impacted bridging to transplant, although survival was improved with early RVAD insertion. The trend toward worse post-transplant survival in the RVAD cohort raises the possibility that if additional patients were evaluated, a difference in survival might be observed, suggesting the need for a multicenter analysis.
使用左心室辅助装置(LVAD)过渡到移植可能会受到严重右心室衰竭(RVF)的限制。本研究的重点是确定严重RVF患者早期植入(<24小时)右心室辅助装置(RVAD)是否能提高生存率,以及严重RVF是否会对移植后生存率产生不利影响。
我们对使用Heartmate装置(美国加利福尼亚州普莱森顿市Thoratec公司)进行移植过渡的经验进行了为期10年的回顾,研究了需要Abiomed RVAD(美国马萨诸塞州丹弗斯市Abiomed公司)的患者。
有243例患者接受了LVAD植入,其中17例(7.0%)需要RVAD。10例患者接受了早期RVAD植入(<24小时),7例接受了延迟植入(>24小时)。11例(64.7%)RVAD患者过渡到移植成功,而非RVAD患者为163例(72.1%)(p = 0.046)。在接受早期RVAD植入的10例患者中,7例(70.0%)成功过渡。在接受延迟RVAD植入的7例患者中,4例(57.1%)成功过渡(p < 0.001)。RVAD患者与非RVAD患者移植后1年、5年和10年生存率无显著差异(RVAD患者分别为71.4%、71.4%和71.4%,非RVAD患者分别为90.5%、80.4%和78.5%;p = 0.366)。移植前RVAD支持不是移植后死亡的危险因素(p = 0.864)。
严重RVF对过渡到移植有不利影响,尽管早期植入RVAD可提高生存率。RVAD队列中移植后生存率有变差的趋势,这增加了如果评估更多患者可能会观察到生存差异的可能性,提示需要进行多中心分析。