• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新技术,旧标准:与标准Hemochron相比,Hemochron Jr对活化凝血时间的测量结果存在差异

New technology, old standards: disparate activated clotting time measurements by the Hemochron Jr compared with the standard Hemochron.

作者信息

Aylsworth Christopher L, Stefan Faith, Woitas Karl, Rieger Randall H, LeBoutillier Martin, DiSesa Verdi J

机构信息

The CardioVascular Center at The Chester County Hospital, West Chester, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Mar;77(3):973-6. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01660-6.

DOI:10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01660-6
PMID:14992909
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate control of the anticoagulation level is important for safe initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass. Using the Hemochron Jr., we consistently noted a higher than customary heparin dose required to achieve an activated clotting time (ACT) that, according to the literature and our quality standards, should be more than 480 seconds. This study was designed to determine whether there existed a significant difference in ACT values measured by the newer Hemochron Jr. and the older Hemochron 801 assay system.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients underwent cardiovascular surgical procedures requiring heparinization (300 U/kg). Multiple samples for measurement of the ACT were obtained from all patients before heparinization, after heparinization, during cardiopulmonary bypass, and after protamine administration. Arterial samples were collected, and ACT was determined simultaneously on the same sample using both Hemochron Jr. and Hemochron 801. Activated clotting time data were analyzed with a linear mixed model using an unstructured variance-covariance matrix.

RESULTS

Descriptive statistics on all heparinized patients revealed that the Hemochron Jr. yielded ACT results that on average were 121.28 seconds lower than the determination by the standard Hemochron 801 on the same sample of blood. This difference was -139.04 in on-pump cases and -90.51 in off-pump cases, primarily a function of the fact that higher heparin doses and therefore longer ACTs were used in patients having operations using the heart-lung machine. From the linear mixed model, the estimated average paired difference between the Hemochron Jr. and Hemochron 801 was found to be -86.03, yielding a highly significant test statistic (t(28) = -6.18; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower ACT values determined by Hemochron Jr. are consistent with higher, clinically acceptable ACT values as measured by the Hemochron 801. These findings would suggest that safe levels of anticoagulation are determined in part by the specific assay used.

摘要

背景

准确控制抗凝水平对于安全启动体外循环至关重要。使用Hemochron Jr.时,我们一直注意到,要达到活化凝血时间(ACT)(根据文献和我们的质量标准,该时间应超过480秒),所需的肝素剂量高于常规剂量。本研究旨在确定新型Hemochron Jr.与旧型Hemochron 801检测系统所测ACT值之间是否存在显著差异。

方法

共有30例患者接受了需要肝素化(300 U/kg)的心血管外科手术。在肝素化前、肝素化后、体外循环期间以及鱼精蛋白给药后,从所有患者身上采集多个用于测量ACT的样本。采集动脉样本,并使用Hemochron Jr.和Hemochron 801在同一样本上同时测定ACT。使用非结构化方差 - 协方差矩阵的线性混合模型分析活化凝血时间数据。

结果

对所有肝素化患者的描述性统计显示,Hemochron Jr.得出的ACT结果平均比标准Hemochron 801对同一份血样的测定结果低121.28秒。在体外循环病例中,这一差异为 -139.04,在非体外循环病例中为 -90.51,这主要是因为在使用心肺机进行手术的患者中使用了更高的肝素剂量,因此ACT更长。从线性混合模型中发现,Hemochron Jr.与Hemochron 801之间估计的平均配对差异为 -86.03,产生了高度显著的检验统计量(t(28) = -6.18;p < 0.0001)。

结论

Hemochron Jr.测定的较低ACT值与Hemochron 801测定的较高且临床可接受的ACT值一致。这些发现表明,抗凝的安全水平部分取决于所使用的特定检测方法。

相似文献

1
New technology, old standards: disparate activated clotting time measurements by the Hemochron Jr compared with the standard Hemochron.新技术,旧标准:与标准Hemochron相比,Hemochron Jr对活化凝血时间的测量结果存在差异
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Mar;77(3):973-6. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01660-6.
2
Clinical evaluation of a microsample coagulation analyzer, and comparison with existing techniques.微量样本凝血分析仪的临床评估及其与现有技术的比较。
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996 Sep;39(1):97-102. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199609)39:1<97::AID-CCD22>3.0.CO;2-K.
3
Monitoring activated clotting time for combined heparin and aprotinin application: in vivo evaluation of a new aprotinin-insensitive test using Sonoclot.监测肝素与抑肽酶联合应用时的活化凝血时间:使用Sonoclot对一种新型抑肽酶不敏感检测方法的体内评估
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Aug;30(2):278-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.05.016. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
4
Activated clotting time monitoring of intraoperative heparinization: our experience and comparison of two techniques.
Surgery. 1981 Nov;90(5):889-95.
5
Maintaining the standard: a quality assurance study for new equipment in the Michigan ECMO Program.维持标准:密歇根体外膜肺氧合项目新设备的质量保证研究
ASAIO J. 2007 Sep-Oct;53(5):556-60. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e31810c082f.
6
Response of kaolin ACT to heparin: evaluation with an automated assay and higher heparin doses.高岭土激活凝血时间(ACT)对肝素的反应:采用自动检测法及更高肝素剂量进行评估
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Mar;61(3):795-9. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00821-7.
7
Measurement of the activated clotting time during cardiopulmonary bypass: differences between Hemotec ACT and Hemochron Jr apparatus.体外循环期间活化凝血时间的测量:Hemotec ACT与Hemochron Jr仪器之间的差异。
Perfusion. 2004;19(5):289-94. doi: 10.1191/0267659104pf755oa.
8
Hand-held personal digital assistant program for the HEMOCHRON RxDx heparin and protamine dosing system.用于HEMOCHRON RxDx肝素和鱼精蛋白给药系统的手持式个人数字助理程序。
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2003 Sep;35(3):212-7.
9
Effects of heparin, haemodilution and aprotinin on kaolin-based activated clotting time: in vitro comparison of two different point of care devices.肝素、血液稀释和抑肽酶对基于高岭土的活化凝血时间的影响:两种不同床旁检测设备的体外比较
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Apr;50(4):461-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00990.x.
10
Activated clotting time systems vary in precision and bias and are not interchangeable when following heparin management protocols during cardiopulmonary bypass.激活凝血时间系统在精度和偏差方面存在差异,在体外循环期间遵循肝素管理方案时不可互换。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2002 Jul;17(5):287-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1021298103264.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical monitoring of activated clotting time during cardiothoracic surgery: comparing the Hemochron Response and Hemochron Signature Elite.心胸外科手术中激活凝血时间的临床监测:比较 Hemochron Response 和 Hemochron Signature Elite。
Perfusion. 2023 Mar;38(2):285-291. doi: 10.1177/02676591211049316. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
2
Considerations for analgosedation and antithrombotic management during extracorporeal life support.体外生命支持期间镇痛镇静和抗血栓管理的考量
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Feb;5(4):69. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.11.45.