Shields Alexandra E, Comstock Catherine, Weiss Kevin B
Health Policy Institute, Georgetown Public Policy Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Pediatrics. 2004 Mar;113(3 Pt 1):496-504. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.3.496.
To examine differences in the process of care for Medicaid-enrolled white, Hispanic, and black children with asthma.
Retrospective cohort study using Medicaid claims data to analyze the process of asthma care in 1994, including all white (non-Hispanic), black (non-Hispanic), and Hispanic children (aged 2-18 years) with asthma in the non-health maintenance organization portion of the Massachusetts Medicaid program (N = 5773). Main outcome measures included performance on 6 claims-based process-of-care measures that reflect national guidelines. Measures addressed primary and specialty care for asthma, appropriate asthma pharmacotherapy, and timely follow-up care after asthma emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations.
Controlling for case mix, provider type, disability status, age, and gender, Hispanic children with asthma were 39% less likely than white children to have a specialist visit for asthma (odds ratio [OR]: 0.61; confidence interval [CI]: 0.46-0.81) and 41% less likely to receive a follow-up visit within 5 days of being seen in the ED for asthma (OR: 0.59; CI: 0.36-0.95). However, Hispanic children received better care in 2 respects. They were 16% more likely than white children to receive a minimum of 2 asthma visits per year (CI: 1.01-1.34) and 27% less likely to be overprescribed beta-agonist medications (OR: 0.73; CI: 0.54-0.99). Black children were 64% less likely than white children to receive timely follow-up care after being seen in the ED for asthma (OR: 0.36; CI: 0.18-0.73). There were no racial/ethnic differences in the prescribing of antiinflammatory medications or timely follow-up care after an asthma hospitalization.
This study demonstrates important differences in the process of care experienced by racial/ethnic subpopulations within a Medicaid population, which may help explain differential outcomes. Efforts to improve asthma outcomes should target specific areas in which black and Hispanic children may be receiving suboptimal care.
研究参加医疗补助计划的白人、西班牙裔和黑人哮喘儿童在治疗过程中的差异。
回顾性队列研究,利用医疗补助计划理赔数据分析1994年哮喘治疗过程,研究对象包括马萨诸塞州医疗补助计划非健康维护组织部分中所有患有哮喘的白人(非西班牙裔)、黑人(非西班牙裔)和西班牙裔儿童(2至18岁)(N = 5773)。主要结局指标包括基于6项理赔的治疗过程指标的表现,这些指标反映了国家指南。指标涉及哮喘的初级和专科护理、适当的哮喘药物治疗,以及哮喘急诊室(ED)就诊和住院后的及时随访护理。
在控制病例组合、医疗服务提供者类型、残疾状况、年龄和性别后,患有哮喘的西班牙裔儿童看哮喘专科医生的可能性比白人儿童低39%(优势比[OR]:0.61;置信区间[CI]:0.46 - 0.81),在因哮喘在急诊室就诊后5天内接受随访的可能性比白人儿童低41%(OR:0.59;CI:0.36 - 0.95)。然而,西班牙裔儿童在两个方面得到了更好的治疗。他们每年至少看2次哮喘门诊的可能性比白人儿童高16%(CI:1.01 - 1.34),被过度开具β-激动剂药物的可能性比白人儿童低27%(OR:0.73;CI:0.54 - 0.99)。黑人儿童因哮喘在急诊室就诊后接受及时随访护理的可能性比白人儿童低64%(OR:0.36;CI:0.18 - 0.73)。在开具抗炎药物或哮喘住院后的及时随访护理方面,不存在种族/族裔差异。
本研究表明,医疗补助计划人群中不同种族/族裔亚人群在治疗过程中存在重要差异,这可能有助于解释不同的治疗结果。改善哮喘治疗结果的努力应针对黑人和西班牙裔儿童可能接受的护理不太理想的特定领域。