Kondo Hiroaki, Suzuki Takahiko, Fukutomi Tatsuya, Suzuki Shogo, Hayase Motoya, Ito Shigenori, Ojio Shinsuke, Ehara Mariko, Takeda Yutaka, Itoh Makoto
Department of Internal Medicine and Bioregulation, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Mar 1;93(5):527-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.11.012.
The benefit of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is limited by the no-reflow phenomenon, resulting in chronic left ventricular (LV) remodeling. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of thrombectomy with the Rescue percutaneous thrombectomy catheter on LV function after AMI. We performed a retrospective study comparing conventional angioplasty with the combination of angioplasty and thrombectomy using the Rescue catheter. The study population was comprised of 109 consecutive patients with AMI who underwent angioplasty and thrombectomy and 86 controls treated with conventional angioplasty. Baseline clinical and lesion characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Postprocedural restoration of normal flow (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3) was more frequent in the thrombectomy group (82% vs 69%, p = 0.03). No differences were observed in cardiac events, including death, reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization (thrombectomy vs controls, 27% vs 33%; p = 0.44) or changes in ejection fraction (p = 0.22) during 6-month follow-up. The incidence of LV remodeling, defined as an increase in LV end-diastolic volume index of >20%, was significantly lower in the thrombectomy group (22% vs 44%; p = 0.01). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that thrombectomy with the Rescue catheter contributed significantly to reduction of both no-reflow and LV remodeling. In the setting of primary angioplasty, adjunctive pretreatment with a rescue catheter reduces the no-reflow phenomenon and protects against LV remodeling.
直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(primary angioplasty)治疗急性心肌梗死(AMI)的益处受到无复流现象的限制,进而导致慢性左心室(LV)重构。本研究旨在评估使用Rescue经皮血栓切除术导管进行血栓切除术对AMI后左心室功能的影响。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,比较了传统血管成形术与使用Rescue导管进行血管成形术和血栓切除术联合治疗的效果。研究人群包括109例连续接受血管成形术和血栓切除术的AMI患者以及86例接受传统血管成形术治疗的对照患者。两组患者的基线临床和病变特征相似。血栓切除术组术后恢复正常血流(心肌梗死溶栓分级3级)的情况更为常见(82%对69%,p = 0.03)。在6个月的随访期间,包括死亡、再梗死和靶血管血运重建在内的心脏事件(血栓切除术组对对照组,27%对33%;p = 0.44)或射血分数的变化(p = 0.22)均未观察到差异。定义为左心室舒张末期容积指数增加>20%的左心室重构发生率在血栓切除术组显著更低(22%对44%;p = 0.01)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,使用Rescue导管进行血栓切除术对减少无复流和左心室重构均有显著作用。在直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术的情况下,使用Rescue导管进行辅助预处理可减少无复流现象并预防左心室重构。