Jain Nitin, Pietrobon Ricardo, Hocker Shawn, Guller Ulrich, Shankar Anoop, Higgins Laurence D
VA Boston Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Pulmonary IIIB, West Roxbury, MA 02132, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Mar;86(3):496-505. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200403000-00006.
As far as we know, no previous study has determined the relationship between volume and outcomes for shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesized that surgeons and hospitals with higher caseloads of total shoulder arthroplasties and hemiarthroplasties have better outcomes as measured by decreased mortality rate, shorter length of stay in the hospital, reduced postoperative complications, and routine disposition of patients on discharge.
Data on patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty were extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases for the years 1988 through 2000. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations and multiple linear regression models were used to estimate the adjusted association between surgeon and hospital volume and outcomes for total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty after adjusting for comorbidity, age, race, household income, and sex.
The mortality rates for patients who had a total shoulder arthroplasty performed by surgeons who did fewer than two procedures per year (0.36%) or who did between two and fewer than four procedures per year (0.32%) were higher than those for patients who had a total shoulder arthroplasty performed by surgeons who did four procedures or more per year (0.20%). The risk-adjusted rate of postoperative complications after hemiarthroplasty was significantly higher for patients managed by surgeons who performed fewer than two procedures per year (1.68%) than for those managed by surgeons with a volume of five procedures or more per year (0.97%). The possibility of postoperative complications when total shoulder arthroplasty was performed in hospitals with a volume of fewer than five procedures (1.44%) or in those with a volume of five to ten procedures per year (1.45%) was significantly higher than that in hospitals where ten procedures or more were performed every year (0.64%). The mean lengths of stay in the hospital after total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty were significantly longer when the operations were performed by surgeons who did fewer than two procedures per year or when they were done in hospitals with a volume of fewer than five procedures per year or with a volume of five to fewer than ten procedures per year than when they were done in hospitals or by surgeons in the highest volume category (p < 0.001).
Patients who have a total shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty performed by a high-volume surgeon or in a high-volume hospital are more likely to have a better outcome.
Therapeutic study, Level III-2 (retrospective cohort study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
据我们所知,此前尚无研究确定肩关节置换手术的手术量与手术结果之间的关系。我们假设,全肩关节置换术和半肩关节置换术手术量较高的外科医生和医院,在降低死亡率、缩短住院时间、减少术后并发症以及患者出院常规处置等方面有更好的手术结果。
从1988年至2000年的全国住院患者样本数据库中提取接受肩关节置换手术患者的数据。使用带有广义估计方程的逻辑回归和多元线性回归模型,在对合并症、年龄、种族、家庭收入和性别进行校正后,估计外科医生和医院手术量与全肩关节置换术和半肩关节置换术手术结果之间的校正关联。
每年手术量少于2例的外科医生进行全肩关节置换术的患者死亡率(0.36%),以及每年手术量在2至少于4例之间的外科医生进行全肩关节置换术的患者死亡率(0.32%),均高于每年手术量为4例或更多的外科医生进行全肩关节置换术的患者死亡率(0.20%)。每年手术量少于2例的外科医生进行半肩关节置换术后,经风险调整后的术后并发症发生率(1.68%)显著高于每年手术量为5例或更多的外科医生(0.97%)。每年手术量少于5例的医院(1.44%)或每年手术量为5至10例的医院(1.45%)进行全肩关节置换术时,术后并发症的可能性显著高于每年手术量为10例或更多的医院(0.64%)。每年手术量少于2例的外科医生进行全肩关节置换术和半肩关节置换术后的平均住院时间,显著长于每年手术量为5至少于10例的医院或最高手术量类别中的医院或外科医生进行手术时的平均住院时间(p < 0.001)。
由高手术量外科医生或在高手术量医院进行全肩关节置换术或半肩关节置换术的患者,更有可能获得更好的手术结果。
治疗性研究,III-2级(回顾性队列研究)。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者须知。