Kim Seung Hoon, Jang Suk-Yong, Cha Yonghan, Jang Hajun, Kim Bo-Yeon, Lee Hyo-Jung, Kim Gui-Ok
Department of Preventive Medicine, Eulji University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Department of Healthcare Management, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Feb;17(1):80-90. doi: 10.4055/cios24193. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
The purpose of our study was to analyze the effects of hospital volume and region on in-hospital and long-term mortality, direct medical costs (DMCs), and length of hospital stay (LOS) in elderly patients following hip fracture, utilizing nationwide claims data.
This retrospective nationwide study sourced its subjects from the Korean National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database spanning from January 2011 to December 2018. A generalized estimating equation model with a Poisson distribution and logarithmic link function was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs to assess the association of hospital volume with in-hospital and 1-year mortality, DMCs, and LOS.
A total of 172,144 patients were included. Comparing the risk of in-hospital death between high-volume and low-volume hospitals, the risk of in-hospital death was 1.2 times higher at low-volume hospitals (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.33; = 0.002). Additionally, the risk of death at 1 year was 1.05 times higher at low-volume hospitals (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09; = 0.008) compared to high-volume hospitals. DMCs were 0.84 times lower at low-volume hospitals for in-hospital period (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.84-0.85; < 0.001) and 0.87 times lower for 1 year (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.86-0.88; < 0.001) compared to high-volume hospitals. In-hospital LOS was 1.21 times longer at low-volume hospitals (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.20-1.22; < 0.001) than at high-volume hospitals. In addition, the risk of in-hospital death was 1.22 times higher (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.12-1.33; < 0.001) and the risk of 1-year death was 1.07 times higher (aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10; < 0.001) at rural hospitals compared to urban hospitals.
Clinicians should focus on improving clinical outcomes for hip fracture patients in low-volume and rural hospital settings, with a specific emphasis on reducing mortality rates.
我们研究的目的是利用全国范围内的索赔数据,分析医院规模和地区对老年髋部骨折患者住院期间及长期死亡率、直接医疗费用(DMC)和住院时间(LOS)的影响。
这项全国性回顾性研究的对象来自韩国国民健康保险审查和评估服务数据库,时间跨度为2011年1月至2018年12月。采用具有泊松分布和对数链接函数的广义估计方程模型来估计调整后的比值比(aOR)和95%置信区间(CI),以评估医院规模与住院期间及1年死亡率、DMC和LOS之间的关联。
共纳入172,144例患者。比较高容量医院和低容量医院的住院死亡风险,低容量医院的住院死亡风险高1.2倍(aOR,1.2;95% CI,1.07 - 1.33;P = 0.002)。此外,与高容量医院相比,低容量医院1年时的死亡风险高1.05倍(aOR,1.05;95% CI,1.01 - 1.09;P = 0.008)。低容量医院的住院期间DMC比高容量医院低0.84倍(aOR,0.84;95% CI,0.84 - 0.85;P < 0.001),1年时低0.87倍(aOR,0.87;95% CI,0.86 - 0.88;P < 0.001)。低容量医院的住院LOS比高容量医院长1.21倍(aOR,1.21;95% CI,1.20 - 1.22;P < 0.001)。此外,与城市医院相比,农村医院的住院死亡风险高1.22倍(aOR,1.22;95% CI,1.12 - 1.33;P < 0.001),1年死亡风险高1.07倍(aOR,1.07;95% CI,1.04 - 1.10;P < 0.001)。
临床医生应关注改善低容量和农村医院环境中髋部骨折患者的临床结局,特别强调降低死亡率。