Stangle Diane E, Strawderman Myla S, Smith Donald, Kuypers Mareike, Strupp Barbara J
Department of Psychology, Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(3):302-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6517.
Although many studies have demonstrated the efficacy of succimer chelation in reducing blood and brain lead levels, the relative efficacy of the drug in the two tissues is less well understood. This issue is important because blood lead levels after chelation are used clinically to estimate reductions in the brain, the most critical organ in considering lead-induced neurotoxicity. The present study was designed to further investigate this issue, using multiple chelation regimens. Long-Evans rats were exposed to one of three lead exposure regimens from birth until postnatal day 40, followed by treatment with succimer (one or two 3-week regimens) or vehicle. The results indicated that one succimer regimen was significantly superior to vehicle treatment in lowering lead levels in both blood and brain across the entire 8-week follow-up period. Similarly, a second succimer regimen offered significant additional benefit relative to one regimen for both blood and brain across the 4-week follow-up period. However, several findings revealed that succimer-induced reductions in brain lead lagged behind reductions in blood lead and were generally smaller in magnitude. Furthermore, a rebound was detected in blood, but not brain, lead levels after both succimer regimens. Given the results of this study, we urge caution in using blood lead as a surrogate for brain lead levels, particularly during and immediately after chelation treatment when reductions in blood lead levels overestimate reductions in brain lead levels. The present results suggest that, in clinical use, succimer treatment may need to extend beyond the point at which blood lead levels have dropped to an "acceptable" target value in order to effectively reduce brain lead levels and minimize neurotoxicity.
尽管许多研究已证明二巯基丁二酸螯合疗法在降低血液和脑铅水平方面的疗效,但该药物在这两种组织中的相对疗效尚不太清楚。这个问题很重要,因为螯合治疗后的血铅水平在临床上用于估计大脑中铅水平的降低情况,而大脑是考虑铅诱导神经毒性时最为关键的器官。本研究旨在使用多种螯合方案进一步调查这个问题。将Long-Evans大鼠从出生到出生后第40天暴露于三种铅暴露方案之一,然后用二巯基丁二酸(一种或两种为期3周的方案)或赋形剂进行治疗。结果表明,在整个8周的随访期内,一种二巯基丁二酸方案在降低血液和脑铅水平方面明显优于赋形剂治疗。同样,在4周的随访期内,相对于一种方案,第二种二巯基丁二酸方案在血液和脑方面都提供了显著的额外益处。然而,一些研究结果显示,二巯基丁二酸诱导的脑铅降低滞后于血铅降低,且幅度通常较小。此外,在两种二巯基丁二酸方案后,血铅水平出现了反弹,但脑铅水平未出现反弹。鉴于本研究的结果,我们敦促在将血铅用作脑铅水平的替代指标时要谨慎,特别是在螯合治疗期间及治疗后立即使用时,此时血铅水平的降低高估了脑铅水平的降低。目前的结果表明,在临床应用中,二巯基丁二酸治疗可能需要延长至血铅水平降至“可接受”目标值之后,以便有效降低脑铅水平并将神经毒性降至最低。