Nowak Dennis A
Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Apr;115(4):839-48. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.11.031.
When we move hand-held objects that exhibit stable physical properties grip force is regulated in anticipation of movement-induced inertial loads. In contrast, when the object's behaviour is unpredictable, grip force is adjusted in response to sensory feedback with the consequence that grip tends to lag behind load. Previous studies analysed reactive and predictive grip force behaviour by systematically varying the predictability of the physical object properties.
This study examines if anticipatory force control also depends on the predictability of the limb dynamics interfering with external objects. The coupling between grip and load force profiles was comparatively analysed during voluntary and externally guided vertical arm movements with an instrumented hand-held object. Voluntary and externally guided movements were performed with and without visual feedback.
During voluntary arm movements grip force was precisely regulated in anticipation of movement-induced inertial load fluctuations with grip force increasing in parallel with load force without an obvious time delay. In contrast, during externally guided movements grip force was regulated in reaction to the imposed load fluctuations. However, the reflex-mediated grip force responses were still flexible to account for the differential loading requirements of movement direction. There was no difference of grip force performance between movements performed with and without visual feedback.
The results suggest that predictability of both the external object and the dynamics of the own body is essential to establish an anticipatory mode of grip force regulation. Unpredictability of the own limb dynamics results in a reactive mode of grip force control. Reactive grip force control appears to be both highly automatised and flexible reflecting differential loading requirements of movement direction.
当我们移动具有稳定物理特性的手持物体时,握力会在预期运动引起的惯性负荷时进行调节。相比之下,当物体的行为不可预测时,握力会根据感觉反馈进行调整,结果是握力往往滞后于负荷。以往的研究通过系统地改变物理物体属性的可预测性来分析反应性和预测性握力行为。
本研究考察预期力控制是否也取决于与外部物体相互作用的肢体动力学的可预测性。在使用仪器化手持物体进行自愿和外部引导的垂直手臂运动期间,对握力和负荷力曲线之间的耦合进行了比较分析。自愿和外部引导的运动在有和没有视觉反馈的情况下进行。
在自愿手臂运动期间,握力会在预期运动引起的惯性负荷波动时得到精确调节,握力与负荷力平行增加且无明显时间延迟。相比之下,在外部引导的运动期间,握力是对施加的负荷波动做出反应而调节的。然而,反射介导的握力反应仍然具有灵活性,以适应运动方向的不同负荷要求。有视觉反馈和无视觉反馈的运动之间握力表现没有差异。
结果表明,外部物体和自身身体动力学的可预测性对于建立握力调节的预期模式至关重要。自身肢体动力学的不可预测性导致握力控制的反应模式。反应性握力控制似乎既高度自动化又具有灵活性,反映了运动方向的不同负荷要求。