Suppr超能文献

对氟西汀反应不佳:潜在抑郁、5-羟色胺能过度刺激还是“治疗窗”?

Poor response to fluoxetine: underlying depression, serotonergic overstimulation, or a "therapeutic window"?

作者信息

Cain J W

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;53(8):272-7.

PMID:1500403
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Symptoms of serotonergic overstimulation may resemble depressive symptoms. Postulating that overmedication with fluoxetine can appear as response failure (as norfluoxetine accumulates), systematic trials of lower doses were conducted in patients who failed to respond despite apparent initial improvements.

METHOD

Of 23 consecutive outpatients treated with fluoxetine 20 mg/day for DSM-III-R major depression, 4 failed to sustain initial improvements during 4-8 weeks of treatment (in the absence of apparent side effects). In these 4 patients, fluoxetine was withdrawn for 2 weeks, then reinstituted at 20 mg q.o.d. All patients were followed up weekly to monthly (for up to 17 months) and administered the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.

RESULTS

Four of 4 patients improved during washout and went on to respond to the lower dose. All 4 cases are presented. On review of the literature, fluoxetine fixed-dose studies reveal increased adverse effects with no increase in efficacy at dosages above 5 mg/day and decreased efficacy at dosages above 40 mg/day. Special issues inherent in the study and use of an antidepressant with a 1- to 3-week active half-life are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Even in the apparent absence of side effects, nonresponse to fluoxetine may be due to overmedication in some patients. Standard doses of fluoxetine may be higher than "optimum." The apparent difficulty distinguishing fluoxetine's adverse effects/toxicity (or a "therapeutic window" effect) from underlying depressive symptoms, taken in conjunction with the 3-9 weeks required to approach steady state, may suggest the option of lowering the dose in some cases of nonresponse or "relapse."

摘要

背景

血清素能过度刺激的症状可能类似于抑郁症状。鉴于氟西汀用药过量可能表现为反应失败(因为去甲氟西汀会蓄积),对那些尽管最初有明显改善但仍无反应的患者进行了低剂量的系统试验。

方法

23例连续门诊患者接受每日20毫克氟西汀治疗DSM-III-R重度抑郁症,其中4例在治疗4至8周期间未能维持最初的改善(且无明显副作用)。在这4例患者中,停用氟西汀2周,然后以每日20毫克隔日一次重新用药。所有患者每周至每月接受随访(最长17个月),并使用17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表。

结果

4例患者在停药期间病情改善,并对低剂量药物产生反应。展示了所有4个病例。查阅文献发现,氟西汀固定剂量研究显示,剂量高于5毫克/日时不良反应增加但疗效未提高,剂量高于40毫克/日时疗效降低。讨论了使用半衰期为1至3周的抗抑郁药进行研究和治疗时固有的特殊问题。

结论

即使明显没有副作用,某些患者对氟西汀无反应可能是由于用药过量。氟西汀的标准剂量可能高于“最佳剂量”。将氟西汀的不良反应/毒性(或“治疗窗”效应)与潜在的抑郁症状区分开来存在明显困难,再加上达到稳态需要3至9周时间,这可能表明在某些无反应或“复发”的情况下可选择降低剂量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验