Roth Jack A, Grammer Susan F
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Box 445, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2004 Feb;18(1):215-29. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8588(03)00144-8.
Current therapy such as radiation and chemotherapy controls less than 50% of lung cancers, summoning the development of novel therapeutic strategies that can directly target the underlying mechanisms of tumorigenesis. The clinical trials summarized in this article clearly demonstrate that contrary to initial predictions that gene therapy would not be suitable for cancer, gene replacement therapy is a viable potential addition to the arsenal for cancer. Gene expression has been documented and occurs even in the presence of an antiadenovirus immune response. Clinical trials have demonstrated that direct intratumor injection can cause tumor regression or prolonged stabilization of local disease, and the low toxicity associated with gene transfer indicates that tumor suppressor gene replacement can be readily combined with existing and future treatments. Initial concerns that the wide diversity of genetic lesions in cancer cells would prevent the application of gene therapy to cancer appear unfounded; on the contrary, correction of a single genetic lesion has resulted in significant tumor regression. Studies combining transfer of tumor suppressor genes with conventional DNA-damaging treatments indicate that correction of a defect in apoptosis induction can restore sensitivity to radiation and chemotherapy in some resistant tumors, and indications that sensitivity to killing might be enhanced in already sensitive tumors may eventually lead to reduced toxicity from chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The most recent data from the laboratory demonstrating damage to tumor suppressor genes in normal tissue and premalignant lesions even suggest that these genes may someday be useful in early intervention, diagnosis, and even prevention of cancer. Despite the obvious promise evident in the results of these studies, however, it is critical to recognize that there are still gaps in knowledge and technology to address. At the current rate of biotechnology development, it is only a matter of time until technical limitations that currently prevent the widespread application of gene therapy to cancer are overcome by development of more efficient vectors, discovery of novel genes, and development of combined modality approaches.
当前的治疗方法,如放疗和化疗,只能控制不到50%的肺癌,这促使人们开发能够直接针对肿瘤发生潜在机制的新型治疗策略。本文总结的临床试验清楚地表明,与最初认为基因治疗不适用于癌症的预测相反,基因替代疗法是癌症治疗手段中一种可行的潜在补充。基因表达已有记录,甚至在存在抗腺病毒免疫反应的情况下也会发生。临床试验表明,直接瘤内注射可导致肿瘤消退或局部疾病长期稳定,而且与基因转移相关的低毒性表明肿瘤抑制基因替代疗法可很容易地与现有及未来的治疗方法相结合。最初担心癌细胞中基因损伤的广泛多样性会阻碍基因治疗在癌症中的应用,现在看来是没有根据的;相反,纠正单个基因损伤已导致肿瘤显著消退。将肿瘤抑制基因转移与传统DNA损伤治疗相结合的研究表明,纠正凋亡诱导缺陷可使一些耐药肿瘤恢复对放疗和化疗的敏感性,而且已有迹象表明,在原本就敏感的肿瘤中增强杀伤敏感性最终可能会降低化疗和放疗的毒性。实验室的最新数据表明正常组织和癌前病变中的肿瘤抑制基因会受到损伤,这甚至提示这些基因有朝一日可能在癌症的早期干预、诊断乃至预防中发挥作用。然而,尽管这些研究结果显示出明显的前景,但必须认识到在知识和技术方面仍有差距需要填补。以目前生物技术的发展速度,当前阻碍基因治疗广泛应用于癌症的技术限制,通过开发更高效的载体、发现新基因以及开发联合治疗方法来克服,只是时间问题。