Berning L M, Shook G E
Dairy Science Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
J Dairy Sci. 1992 Jul;75(7):1840-8. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77943-0.
The objectives of this work were 1) to examine the responsiveness of SCC, lactose concentration, and NAGase activity in milk to changes in bacteriological status and 2) to develop models for predicting bacteriological status of mammary glands. Data included 550 cows in 10 commercial herds. Natural logarithm NAGase and log cell count were most responsive to changes in bacterial status. The log NAGase was relatively more effective in identifying major from minor pathogen infections, whereas log SCC was better able to differentiate between infected and uninfected classes. Non-transformed NAGase, SCC, and lactose were considerably less responsive to infection status. Logistic regression of bacterial status on herd, lactation number, milk, log SCC, log NAGase, and stage of lactation was performed. The least significant variables were removed in a stepwise process. Final predictors of infection status were herd, log SCC, and log NAGase. The role of log SCC was to discriminate infection from no infection, whereas log NAGase discriminated major from minor pathogens. The log NAGase, alone or in combination with log SCC, added substantially to the detection power of the model. Chi-square goodness of fit tests found no significant differences between observed and predicted infection probabilities. Substitution of herd averages for log SCC and log NAGase for the herd variables resulted in significant differences between predicted and observed herd infection probabilities.
1)研究牛奶中体细胞计数(SCC)、乳糖浓度和N - 乙酰 - β - 氨基葡萄糖苷酶(NAGase)活性对细菌学状态变化的反应;2)建立预测乳腺细菌学状态的模型。数据包括10个商业牛群中的550头奶牛。自然对数转换后的NAGase和对数细胞计数对细菌状态变化反应最为敏感。对数NAGase在区分主要病原体感染和次要病原体感染方面相对更有效,而对数SCC在区分感染和未感染类别方面表现更佳。未转换的NAGase、SCC和乳糖对感染状态的反应要小得多。对牛群、泌乳次数、牛奶、对数SCC、对数NAGase和泌乳阶段进行细菌状态的逻辑回归分析。在逐步过程中去除最不显著的变量。感染状态的最终预测因子是牛群、对数SCC和对数NAGase。对数SCC的作用是区分感染和未感染,而对数NAGase则区分主要病原体和次要病原体。对数NAGase单独或与对数SCC结合使用,显著提高了模型的检测能力。卡方拟合优度检验发现观察到的和预测的感染概率之间没有显著差异。用牛群平均值替代对数SCC,用对数NAGase替代牛群变量,导致预测的和观察到的牛群感染概率之间存在显著差异。