Suppr超能文献

用于诊断成人生长激素缺乏症的胰高血糖素刺激试验。

Glucagon stimulation test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults.

作者信息

Conceição F L, da Costa e Silva A, Leal Costa A J, Vaisman M

机构信息

Service of Endocrinology, Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

J Endocrinol Invest. 2003 Nov;26(11):1065-70. doi: 10.1007/BF03345251.

Abstract

The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is considered the test of choice for the diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD). However, in patients with contraindications to ITT, alternative provocative tests must be used with appropriate cut-offs. The glucagon stimulation test has proved to be a safe, low-cost and effective means of stimulating GH secretion, and therefore can be considered as a suitable alternative to the ITT. We have studied the GH response to the glucagon test in 33 patients with known pituitary disease, 12 males and 21 females, aged between 21 and 60 yr (41.18 +/- 9.47 yr); 5 had isolated GHD and 28 had panhypopituitarism. We also evaluated a control group of 25 individuals, matched for age and sex (8 males and 17 females), aged between 20 and 60 yr (39.28 +/- 12.10 yr). They were selected via the ITT if their peak GH response was > 5.0 ng/ml. GH peak after glucagon was significantly lower in the group of patients compared to the control group (0.49 +/- 0.85 vs 8.69 +/- 5.85 ng/ml, p = 0.0001). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plot analyses of the control and GHD group showed an area under the curve of 0.982 for GH peak response to glucagon. The response value of 3.0 ng/ml showed the best pair of sensitivity (97%)/specificity (88%), and was chosen as the cut-off defining GHD. After evaluation of positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) through simulation of different prevalences of the disease, we concluded that the cut-off point of 3.00 ng/ml maximizes both PPV and NPV (100%). In conclusion, we have shown that the glucagon stimulation test has a good performance and great diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of GHD.

摘要

胰岛素耐量试验(ITT)被认为是诊断生长激素缺乏症(GHD)的首选试验。然而,对于有ITT禁忌证的患者,必须使用替代的激发试验并采用适当的临界值。胰高血糖素刺激试验已被证明是一种安全、低成本且有效的刺激生长激素分泌的方法,因此可被视为ITT的合适替代方法。我们研究了33例已知垂体疾病患者对胰高血糖素试验的生长激素反应,其中男性12例,女性21例,年龄在21至60岁之间(41.18±9.47岁);5例为孤立性GHD,28例为全垂体功能减退症。我们还评估了一个由25名个体组成的对照组,其年龄和性别相匹配(男性8例,女性17例),年龄在20至60岁之间(39.28±12.10岁)。如果他们的生长激素峰值反应>5.0 ng/ml,则通过ITT进行选择。与对照组相比,患者组胰高血糖素后的生长激素峰值显著降低(0.49±0.85 vs 8.69±5.85 ng/ml,p = 0.0001)。对照组和GHD组的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示,生长激素对胰高血糖素峰值反应的曲线下面积为0.982。3.0 ng/ml的反应值显示出最佳的敏感性(97%)/特异性(88%)组合,并被选为定义GHD的临界值。在通过模拟不同疾病患病率评估阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)后,我们得出结论,3.00 ng/ml的临界值可使PPV和NPV均最大化(100%)。总之,我们已经表明,胰高血糖素刺激试验在诊断GHD方面具有良好的性能和较高的诊断准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验