• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用胰高血糖素刺激试验评估老年人的生长激素和皮质醇分泌。

Growth hormone and cortisol secretion in the elderly evaluated using the glucagon stimulation test.

作者信息

Tavares Ana Beatriz Winter, Seixas-da-Silva Ignácio Antônio, Silvestre Diego H S, Pinheiro Maria Fernanda Castelar, Vaisman Mario, Conceição Flávia Lucia

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology - Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Sergio Franco Medicina Diagnóstica Laboratory, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Endocrine. 2017 May;56(2):317-324. doi: 10.1007/s12020-017-1275-8. Epub 2017 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1007/s12020-017-1275-8
PMID:28285384
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The glucagon stimulation test is a reliable alternative test to assess growth hormone and cortisol secretion, but has not been widely used in the elderly population. The aim of this study was to evaluate growth hormone and cortisol secretion using the glucagon stimulation test in an elderly population without known hypothalamic-pituitary disease and to correlate growth hormone and cortisol peaks with age (less than or greater than 80 years) and body mass index.

METHODS

Forty-two subjects (67-88 years) from the geriatric ambulatory unit were submitted and 41 subjects completed the glucagon stimulation test.

RESULTS

Median growth hormone peak was 5.99 μg/L and median cortisol peak was 21.6 μg/dL. Growth hormone peak was >3 µg/L in 73.2%, and cortisol peak was >18 µg/dL in 65.8% of patients. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the growth hormone peak and the cortisol peak. The cortisol peak was significantly different between subjects stratified by growth hormone peak of < or >3 μg/L (15.7 and 21.8 μg/dL, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in cortisol peak according to age < or > 80 years (22.4 and 18.5 µg/dL, respectively). Considering lower cut-offs recently proposed for growth hormone peak (1.0 μg/L for overweight subjects) and cortisol peak (9.1 μg/dL), only two patients had a growth hormone peak below this value, and all patients had preserved cortisol secretion.

CONCLUSIONS

We did find a positive correlation between growth hormone and cortisol peaks in the glucagon stimulation test in the elderly, confirming the capacity of the glucagon stimulation test to stimulate both axes. According to the new proposed cut-points for growth hormone and cortisol, we had 95% of normal growth hormone and 100% of normal cortisol responses.

摘要

目的

胰高血糖素刺激试验是评估生长激素和皮质醇分泌的一种可靠替代试验,但在老年人群中尚未广泛应用。本研究的目的是在无已知下丘脑-垂体疾病的老年人群中,使用胰高血糖素刺激试验评估生长激素和皮质醇分泌,并将生长激素和皮质醇峰值与年龄(小于或大于80岁)和体重指数进行关联。

方法

来自老年门诊的42名受试者(67 - 88岁)接受了检查,41名受试者完成了胰高血糖素刺激试验。

结果

生长激素峰值中位数为5.99μg/L,皮质醇峰值中位数为21.6μg/dL。73.2%的患者生长激素峰值>3μg/L,65.8%的患者皮质醇峰值>18μg/dL。生长激素峰值与皮质醇峰值之间存在统计学显著正相关。根据生长激素峰值<或>3μg/L分层的受试者之间,皮质醇峰值有显著差异(分别为15.7和21.8μg/dL)。根据年龄<或>80岁,皮质醇峰值有统计学显著差异(分别为22.4和18.5μg/dL)。考虑到最近提出的生长激素峰值(超重受试者为1.0μg/L)和皮质醇峰值(9.1μg/dL)的较低临界值,只有两名患者的生长激素峰值低于该值,且所有患者的皮质醇分泌均正常。

结论

我们确实发现老年患者胰高血糖素刺激试验中生长激素和皮质醇峰值之间存在正相关,证实了胰高血糖素刺激试验刺激两个轴的能力。根据新提出的生长激素和皮质醇切点,我们有95%的生长激素反应正常,100%的皮质醇反应正常。

相似文献

1
Growth hormone and cortisol secretion in the elderly evaluated using the glucagon stimulation test.使用胰高血糖素刺激试验评估老年人的生长激素和皮质醇分泌。
Endocrine. 2017 May;56(2):317-324. doi: 10.1007/s12020-017-1275-8. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
2
SERUM FREE CORTISOL DURING GLUCAGON STIMULATION TEST IN HEALTHY SHORT-STATURED CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS.健康矮身材儿童和青少年在胰高血糖素刺激试验中血清游离皮质醇。
Endocr Pract. 2018 Mar;24(3):288-293. doi: 10.4158/EP-2017-0132.
3
Revised GH and cortisol cut-points for the glucagon stimulation test in the evaluation of GH and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axes in adults: results from a prospective randomized multicenter study.用于评估成人生长激素(GH)和下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴的胰高血糖素刺激试验中GH和皮质醇的修订切点:一项前瞻性随机多中心研究的结果
Pituitary. 2016 Jun;19(3):332-41. doi: 10.1007/s11102-016-0712-7.
4
The comparison of low and standard dose ACTH and glucagon stimulation tests in the evaluation of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in healthy adults.在健康成年人下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴评估中,低剂量和标准剂量 ACTH 与胰高血糖素刺激试验的比较。
Pituitary. 2011 Jun;14(2):134-40. doi: 10.1007/s11102-010-0270-3.
5
Cortisol cut-points for the glucagon stimulation test in the evaluation of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis.用于评估下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴的胰高血糖素刺激试验的皮质醇切点。
Endocr J. 2018 Sep 27;65(9):935-942. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ18-0147. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
6
A comparison between the 1-microg adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) test, the short ACTH (250 microg) test, and the insulin tolerance test in the assessment of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis immediately after pituitary surgery.垂体手术后立即评估下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴时,1微克促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)试验、短程ACTH(250微克)试验和胰岛素耐量试验之间的比较。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Oct;85(10):3713-9. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.10.6879.
7
Potential risks of glucagon stimulation test in elderly people.老年人胰高血糖素刺激试验的潜在风险。
Growth Horm IGF Res. 2015 Feb;25(1):53-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ghir.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
8
Comparison of pituitary-adrenal responsiveness between insulin tolerance test and growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 test: a pilot study.胰岛素耐量试验与生长激素释放肽-2 试验对垂体-肾上腺反应性的比较:一项初步研究。
Peptides. 2010 Apr;31(4):657-61. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.12.023. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
9
Effect of recombinant human growth hormone (GH) replacement on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in adult GH-deficient patients.重组人生长激素(GH)替代治疗对成年生长激素缺乏患者下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴的影响。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Nov;89(11):5397-401. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1114.
10
Diagnostic utility of the glucagon stimulation test in comparison to the insulin tolerance test in patients following pituitary surgery.在垂体手术后的患者中,与胰岛素耐量试验相比,胰高血糖素刺激试验的诊断效用。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2010 Mar;162(3):477-82. doi: 10.1530/EJE-09-0824. Epub 2009 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The history of an effective, specific and sensitive diagnostic test: the GHRH test in clinical practice.一项有效、特异且灵敏的诊断测试的历史:临床实践中的生长激素释放激素(GHRH)测试。
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2024 Dec 17. doi: 10.1007/s11154-024-09938-1.
2
Anterior pituitary hormone dysfunction among individuals with complete heart block requiring pacemaker.完全性心脏传导阻滞需起搏器治疗者的垂体前叶激素功能障碍。
Indian J Med Res. 2024 Jun;159(6):695-701. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_622_22.
3
Once upon a time: the glucagon stimulation test in diagnosing adult GH deficiency.

本文引用的文献

1
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY DISEASE STATE CLINICAL REVIEW: UPDATE ON GROWTH HORMONE STIMULATION TESTING AND PROPOSED REVISED CUT-POINT FOR THE GLUCAGON STIMULATION TEST IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ADULT GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY.美国临床内分泌医师协会和美国内分泌学会疾病临床评论:生长激素刺激试验的更新和诊断成人生长激素缺乏症时葡萄糖刺激试验拟议的新切点。
Endocr Pract. 2016 Oct;22(10):1235-1244. doi: 10.4158/EP161407.DSCR. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
2
Revised GH and cortisol cut-points for the glucagon stimulation test in the evaluation of GH and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axes in adults: results from a prospective randomized multicenter study.用于评估成人生长激素(GH)和下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴的胰高血糖素刺激试验中GH和皮质醇的修订切点:一项前瞻性随机多中心研究的结果
Pituitary. 2016 Jun;19(3):332-41. doi: 10.1007/s11102-016-0712-7.
3
曾几何时:胰高血糖素刺激试验在诊断成人 GH 缺乏症中的应用。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2024 Jul;47(7):1621-1631. doi: 10.1007/s40618-024-02322-5. Epub 2024 Mar 10.
4
Diagnosis and testing for growth hormone deficiency across the ages: a global view of the accuracy, caveats, and cut-offs for diagnosis.各年龄段生长激素缺乏症的诊断与检测:关于诊断准确性、注意事项及临界值的全球视角
Endocr Connect. 2023 Jun 12;12(7). doi: 10.1530/EC-22-0504. Print 2023 Jul 1.
5
Investigation of the Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis: a contemporary synthesis.下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴的研究:当代综合。
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2021 Jun;22(2):179-204. doi: 10.1007/s11154-020-09611-3. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
6
Glucagon stimulation test: has its time come?胰高血糖素刺激试验:它的时代来临了吗?
Endocrine. 2017 Sep;57(3):361-363. doi: 10.1007/s12020-017-1356-8. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
Effects of gender, body weight, and blood glucose dynamics on the growth hormone response to the glucagon stimulation test in patients with pituitary disease.性别、体重及血糖动态变化对垂体疾病患者胰高血糖素刺激试验中生长激素反应的影响。
Growth Horm IGF Res. 2016 Feb;26:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ghir.2015.12.005. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
4
Can a glucagon stimulation test characterized by lower GH cut-off value be used for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adults?以较低生长激素临界值为特征的胰高血糖素刺激试验能否用于诊断成人生长激素缺乏症?
Pituitary. 2015 Dec;18(6):884-92. doi: 10.1007/s11102-015-0666-1.
5
Potential risks of glucagon stimulation test in elderly people.老年人胰高血糖素刺激试验的潜在风险。
Growth Horm IGF Res. 2015 Feb;25(1):53-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ghir.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
6
Overweight/Obese adults with pituitary disorders require lower peak growth hormone cutoff values on glucagon stimulation testing to avoid overdiagnosis of growth hormone deficiency.患有垂体疾病的超重/肥胖成年人在胰高血糖素刺激试验中需要较低的生长激素峰值临界值,以避免生长激素缺乏的过度诊断。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Dec;99(12):4712-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2830.
7
Age-dependent and gender-dependent regulation of hypothalamic-adrenocorticotropic-adrenal axis.下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴的年龄依赖性和性别依赖性调节。
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2013 Jun;42(2):201-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
8
Clinical characteristics, timing of peak responses and safety aspects of two dosing regimens of the glucagon stimulation test in evaluating growth hormone and cortisol secretion in adults.两种剂量促胰高血糖素刺激试验评估成人生长激素和皮质醇分泌的临床特征、反应峰值时间和安全性方面。
Pituitary. 2013 Jun;16(2):220-30. doi: 10.1007/s11102-012-0407-7.
9
Glucagon stimulation testing in assessing for adult growth hormone deficiency: current status and future perspectives.胰高血糖素刺激试验在评估成人生长激素缺乏症中的应用:现状与未来展望。
ISRN Endocrinol. 2011;2011:608056. doi: 10.5402/2011/608056. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
10
Evaluation and treatment of adult growth hormone deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline.成人生长激素缺乏症的评估和治疗:内分泌学会临床实践指南。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jun;96(6):1587-609. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0179.