Schleimer Karina, Stippel Dirk L, Kasper Hans U, Suer Christian, Tawadros Samir, Hoelscher Arnulf H, Beckurts K Tobias E
Department of Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 9, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
J Surg Res. 2004 Feb;116(2):202-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2003.10.003.
The clinical results of portal vein arterialization (PVA) in liver transplantation are controversial without a standardized portal flow regulation. The aim of these experiments was to perform a flow-regulated PVA in liver transplantation, to examine the microcirculation and early graft function after heterotopic auxiliary liver transplantation (HALT) with flow-regulated PVA, and to compare this technique with HALT with porto-portal anastomosis. Using the recently developed orthogonal polarization spectral (OPS) imaging, for the first time the microcirculation of liver grafts with PVA was visualized.
HALT was performed in Lewis rats. The portal vein was either completely arterialized via the right renal artery in a standardized splint-technique (Group I, n = 8) or anastomosed end-to-end to the recipient's portal vein (Group II, n = 8).
After reperfusion, the average blood flow in the portal vein was within the normal range in Group I (1.7 +/- 0.4 ml/min/g liver weight) and significantly higher than in Group II (1.2 +/- 0.2 ml/min/g liver weight). The functional sinusoidal density in Group I (335 +/- 48/microm) was significantly higher than in Group II (232 +/- 58/microm), whereas the diameter of the sinusoids and the postsinusoidal venules yielded no significant differences between both groups. The bile production was comparable (27 +/- 8 versus 29 +/- 11 microl/h/g liver weight).
In our experiments it was possible to achieve an adequate flow regulation in the arterialized portal vein with good results concerning microcirculation and early graft function. We recommend that further investigations on liver transplantation with PVA should be performed with portal flow regulation, before PVA is employed in clinical transplantation.
在缺乏标准化门静脉血流调节的情况下,肝移植中门静脉动脉化(PVA)的临床结果存在争议。这些实验的目的是在肝移植中进行血流调节的PVA,研究血流调节的PVA在异位辅助肝移植(HALT)后的微循环和早期移植物功能,并将该技术与门静脉-门静脉吻合的HALT进行比较。使用最近开发的正交偏振光谱(OPS)成像,首次可视化了PVA肝移植物的微循环。
在Lewis大鼠中进行HALT。门静脉要么通过标准化夹板技术经右肾动脉完全动脉化(I组,n = 8),要么与受体门静脉端端吻合(II组,n = 8)。
再灌注后,I组门静脉平均血流在正常范围内(1.7±0.4 ml/min/g肝重),显著高于II组(1.2±0.2 ml/min/g肝重)。I组功能性窦状隙密度(335±48/μm)显著高于II组(232±58/μm),而两组间窦状隙和窦后小静脉直径无显著差异。胆汁生成相当(27±8与29±11 μl/h/g肝重)。
在我们的实验中,能够在动脉化门静脉中实现充分的血流调节,在微循环和早期移植物功能方面取得良好结果。我们建议,在将PVA应用于临床移植之前,应在门静脉血流调节的情况下对PVA肝移植进行进一步研究。