Suppr超能文献

通过具有电子轰击和化学电离的全扫描气相色谱-离子阱质谱法鉴定甲基苯丙胺和非处方拟交感神经胺。

Identification of methamphetamines and over-the-counter sympathometic amines by full-scan GC-ion trap MS with electron impact and chemical ionization.

作者信息

Wu A H, Onigbinde T A, Wong S S, Johnson K G

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77030.

出版信息

J Anal Toxicol. 1992 Mar-Apr;16(2):137-41. doi: 10.1093/jat/16.2.137.

Abstract

An underivatized methane chemical ionization (CI) assay for measuring amphetamines in urine was evaluated against derivatized electron impact (EI) assays using a gas chromatograph-ion trap mass spectrometer. The full-scan CI mass spectra of methamphetamine, ephedrine/pseudoephedrine, and phentermine were compared with the full scan and three-ion EI mass spectra of heptafluorobutyric anhydride (HFBA) and 4-carbethoxyhexafluorobutyryl chloride (CB) derivatives. The fragmentation patterns for these compounds were nearly identical for the three major high molecular weight ions (m/z 254, 210, and 169 for EI-HFBA derivatives, and m/z 308, 262, and 280 for EI-CB derivatives). The CI mass spectra of the underivatized drugs contained more discernible differences at the higher molecular weights, including m/z 119, 148, and 150 for methamphetamine, 148, 166, and 176 for ephedrine/pseudoephedrine, and 91, 133, and 150 for phentermine. The within-run precision ranged from 7-9% for CI versus 5-6% for EI with HFBA derivatization (mean 500 ng/mL, n = 5). The limits of detection (LOD) for amphetamine and methamphetamine were 2.4 and 8.6 ng/mL, respectively, for CI versus 0.7 and 1.4 ng/mL for EI. The limits of quantitation (LOQ) were 4.5 and 19.1 ng/mL for CI versus 1.4 and 5.7 ng/mL for EI. The use of full-scan mass spectral analysis with either electron impact or chemical ionization provides additional qualitative data that may be helpful for measuring methamphetamine in the presence of other sympathomimetic amines.

摘要

使用气相色谱 - 离子阱质谱仪,对一种用于测量尿液中苯丙胺类药物的未衍生化甲烷化学电离(CI)分析方法与衍生化电子轰击(EI)分析方法进行了评估。将甲基苯丙胺、麻黄碱/伪麻黄碱和苯丁胺的全扫描CI质谱图与七氟丁酸酐(HFBA)和4 - 乙氧羰基六氟丁酰氯(CB)衍生物的全扫描和三离子EI质谱图进行了比较。对于这三种主要的高分子量离子(EI - HFBA衍生物的m/z 254、210和169,以及EI - CB衍生物的m/z 308、262和280),这些化合物的碎裂模式几乎相同。未衍生化药物的CI质谱图在较高分子量处包含更多可辨别的差异,包括甲基苯丙胺的m/z 119、148和150,麻黄碱/伪麻黄碱的m/z 148、166和176,以及苯丁胺的m/z 91、133和150。CI方法的批内精密度范围为7 - 9%,而EI与HFBA衍生化方法的批内精密度为5 - 6%(均值500 ng/mL,n = 5)。苯丙胺和甲基苯丙胺的CI检测限(LOD)分别为2.4和8.6 ng/mL,而EI的检测限分别为0.7和1.4 ng/mL。CI的定量限(LOQ)为4.5和19.1 ng/mL,而EI的定量限为1.4和5.7 ng/mL。使用电子轰击或化学电离的全扫描质谱分析可提供额外的定性数据,这可能有助于在存在其他拟交感神经胺的情况下测量甲基苯丙胺。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验