González Asensio A, Farré Ricard, Clavé Pere
Fundació de Gastroenterologia Dr. Francisco Vilardell, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2004 Jul;287(1):G299-306. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00534.2003. Epub 2004 Mar 11.
To compare electrical field stimulation (EFS) with nicotine in the stimulation of excitatory and inhibitory enteric motoneurons (EMN) in the human esophagus, circular lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and circular and longitudinal esophageal body (EB) strips from 20 humans were studied in organ baths. Responses to EFS or nicotine (100 microM) were compared in basal conditions, after N(G)-nitro-l-arginine (l-NNA; 100 microM), and after l-NNA and apamin (1 microM). LES strips developed myogenic tone enhanced by TTX (5 microM) or l-NNA. EFS-LES relaxation was abolished by TTX, unaffected by hexamethonium (100 microM), and enhanced by atropine (3 microM). Nicotine-LES relaxation was higher than EFS relaxation, reduced by TTX or atropine, and blocked by hexamethonium. After l-NNA, EFS elicited a strong cholinergic contraction in circular LES and EB, and nicotine elicited a small relaxation in LES and no contractile effect in EB. After l-NNA and apamin, EFS elicited a strong cholinergic contraction in LES and EB, and nicotine elicited a weak contraction amounting to 6.64 +/- 3.19 and 9.20 +/- 5.51% of that induced by EFS. EFS elicited a contraction in longitudinal strips; after l-NNA and apamin, nicotine did not induce any response. Inhibitory EMN tonically inhibit myogenic LES tone and are efficiently stimulated both by EFS and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) located in somatodendritic regions and nerve terminals, releasing nitric oxide and an apamin-sensitive neurotransmitter. In contrast, although esophageal excitatory EMN are efficiently stimulated by EFS, their stimulation through nAChRs is difficult and causes weak responses, suggesting the participation of nonnicotinic mechanisms in neurotransmission to excitatory EMN in human esophagus.
为比较电场刺激(EFS)与尼古丁对人食管、食管下括约肌(LES)环形肌以及食管体部(EB)环形肌和纵行肌中兴奋性和抑制性肠运动神经元(EMN)的刺激作用,在器官浴槽中对来自20名受试者的上述组织条进行了研究。比较了在基础状态下、给予N(G)-硝基-L-精氨酸(L-NNA;100μM)后以及给予L-NNA和蜂毒明肽(1μM)后,EFS或尼古丁(100μM)所引起的反应。LES肌条产生的肌源性张力可被TTX(5μM)或L-NNA增强。TTX可消除EFS引起的LES舒张,六甲铵(100μM)对其无影响,阿托品(3μM)可增强该舒张作用。尼古丁引起的LES舒张作用强于EFS,可被TTX或阿托品减弱,并被六甲铵阻断。给予L-NNA后,EFS可在LES环形肌和EB中引起强烈的胆碱能收缩,而尼古丁可使LES产生轻微舒张,对EB则无收缩作用。给予L-NNA和蜂毒明肽后,EFS可在LES和EB中引起强烈的胆碱能收缩,而尼古丁引起的收缩较弱,分别相当于EFS诱导收缩的6.64±3.19%和9.20±5.51%。EFS可引起纵行肌条收缩;给予L-NNA和蜂毒明肽后,尼古丁未诱导出任何反应。抑制性EMN可紧张性抑制LES的肌源性张力,EFS和位于胞体树突区域及神经末梢的烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体(nAChRs)均可有效刺激抑制性EMN,使其释放一氧化氮和一种对蜂毒明肽敏感的神经递质。相比之下,尽管EFS可有效刺激食管兴奋性EMN,但通过nAChRs对其进行刺激较为困难且引起的反应较弱,这表明非烟碱机制参与了人食管兴奋性EMN的神经传递过程。