Wang Qi, Blackford John A, Song Liang-Nian, Huang Ying, Cho Sehyung, Simons S Stoney
Steriod Hormones Section, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease/Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Mol Endocrinol. 2004 Jun;18(6):1376-95. doi: 10.1210/me.2003-0421. Epub 2004 Mar 11.
Corepressors and coactivators can modulate the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) complexed with agonist and antagonist steroids, respectively, in intact cells. We recently reported that GR-antagonist complexes bind to the coactivator TIF2, (transcriptional intermediary factor 2), which is consistent with the whole-cell effects of coactivators being mediated by direct interactions with GR complexes. We now ask whether the whole-cell modulatory activity of corepressors also entails binding to both GR-agonist and -antagonist complexes and whether the association of corepressors and coactivators with GR complexes involves competitive equilibrium reactions. In mammalian two-hybrid assays with two different cell lines and in cell-free pull-down and whole-cell immunoprecipitation assays, the corepressors NCoR (nuclear receptor corepressor) and SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor) associate with agonist and antagonist complexes of GRs. Both N- and C-terminal regions of GR are needed for corepressor binding, which requires the CoRNR box motifs that mediate corepressor binding to other nuclear/steroid receptors. Importantly, whole-cell GR interactions with corepressors are competitively inhibited by excess coactivator and vice versa. However, the regions of the coactivator TIF2 that compete for GR binding to corepressor and coactivator are not the same, implying a molecular difference in GR association with coactivators and corepressors. Finally, when the whole-cell ratio of coactivators to corepressors is altered by selective cofactor binding to exogenous thyroid receptor beta +/- thyroid hormone, the GR dose-response-curve and partial agonist activity are appropriately modified. Such modifications are independent of histone acetylation. We conclude that mutually antagonistic equilibrium interactions of corepressors and coactivators modulate the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of GR complexes in a manner that is responsive to the intracellular ratio of these two classes of cofactors. This modulation provides an attractive mechanism for differential control of gene expression during development, differentiation, homeostasis, and endocrine therapies.
共抑制因子和共激活因子可分别调节完整细胞中与激动剂和拮抗剂类固醇复合的糖皮质激素受体(GRs)的剂量反应曲线和部分激动剂活性。我们最近报道,GR-拮抗剂复合物与共激活因子TIF2(转录中介因子2)结合,这与共激活因子通过与GR复合物的直接相互作用介导的全细胞效应一致。我们现在要问,共抑制因子的全细胞调节活性是否也需要与GR-激动剂和-拮抗剂复合物结合,以及共抑制因子和共激活因子与GR复合物的结合是否涉及竞争性平衡反应。在使用两种不同细胞系的哺乳动物双杂交试验以及无细胞下拉和全细胞免疫沉淀试验中,共抑制因子NCoR(核受体共抑制因子)和SMRT(视黄酸和甲状腺激素受体沉默介质)与GRs的激动剂和拮抗剂复合物结合。GR的N端和C端区域都是共抑制因子结合所必需的,这需要介导共抑制因子与其他核/类固醇受体结合的CoRNR框基序。重要的是,全细胞中GR与共抑制因子的相互作用会被过量的共激活因子竞争性抑制,反之亦然。然而,共激活因子TIF2中与GR结合共抑制因子和共激活因子竞争的区域并不相同,这意味着GR与共激活因子和共抑制因子结合存在分子差异。最后,当通过选择性辅因子与外源性甲状腺受体β+/-甲状腺激素结合来改变共激活因子与共抑制因子的全细胞比例时,GR剂量反应曲线和部分激动剂活性会得到适当改变。这种改变与组蛋白乙酰化无关。我们得出结论,共抑制因子和共激活因子相互拮抗的平衡相互作用以一种对这两类辅因子的细胞内比例有反应的方式调节GR复合物的剂量反应曲线和部分激动剂活性。这种调节为发育、分化、体内平衡和内分泌治疗期间基因表达的差异控制提供了一种有吸引力的机制。