Suppr超能文献

Appropriate consent and referral for general anaesthesia - a survey in the Paediatric Day Care Unit, Barnsley DGH NHS Trust, South Yorkshire.

作者信息

Patel A M

机构信息

Orthodontic Department, Birmingham Dental Hospital, St. Chad's Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 2004 Mar 13;196(5):275-7; discussion 271. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811039.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In November 1998 the General Dental Council introduced guidelines for dental practitioners when referring a patient for general anaesthesia (GA). The practitioner is required to explain the risks associated with GA and the alternatives, give a detailed medical history and a clear justification for providing GA in the letter of referral.

METHOD

A survey was administered on 202 parents or guardians, which aimed to investigate whether they felt that their dental practitioners had advised them of any risks of GA prior to referral. A record was also made if any reasons were given for the provision of GA in the letter of referral.

RESULTS

The majority of the parents or guardians (66%) felt that they were not informed of any of the risks of GA and 25% felt that they were. From the letters of referral, 37% contained a reason for GA and 63% did not give any reason or justification for GA.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence that referring practitioners do not adequately explain the risks of the anaesthetic to parents or guardians of children undergoing GA. There is also a lack of clear justification in the letters of referral for providing GA.

PRACTICE IMPLICATION

It is essential that the alternatives and the risks of GA are discussed and if GA is still required, a clear justification should be contained in the letter of referral as part of informed consent. More importantly the referring practitioner should keep a contemporaneous record of this, preferably with a signature from the parent or guardian on agreement of referral.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验