Suppr超能文献

全髋关节置换术后的病程:伤口引流与不引流的对比

Postoperative course after total hip arthroplasty: wound drainage versus no drainage.

作者信息

Hallstrom B R, Steele J F

机构信息

Boston University.

出版信息

Orthop Rev. 1992 Jul;21(7):847-51.

PMID:1501922
Abstract

This retrospective study of 364 patients with total hip replacements performed between 1985 and 1990 showed no benefit in the use of drains and found an increased rate of transfusion associated with the use of drains. The two study groups (171 patients with two closed-wound suction drains in the wound and 193 patients closed without drains) differed in the type but not in the rate of wound problems; the drained group had more drainage at the port site, whereas the undrained group had more ecchymosis and swelling. There was no significant difference between the groups in operative blood loss; however, the drained group did require transfusions significantly more often than the undrained group (98 of 171 [57.3%] as opposed to 83 of 193 [43%], respectively). Of the patients requiring transfusions, patients with wound drains required significantly more blood than those without drains (1.12 versus 0.62 transfusions per patient for men; 1.73 versus 1.03 transfusions per patient for women).

摘要

这项对1985年至1990年间进行全髋关节置换术的364例患者的回顾性研究表明,使用引流管并无益处,且发现使用引流管会增加输血率。两个研究组(171例伤口内放置两个闭式伤口吸引引流管的患者和193例未放置引流管而缝合伤口的患者)在伤口问题的类型上存在差异,但在发生率上无差异;放置引流管的组在引流口处有更多引流液,而未放置引流管的组有更多瘀斑和肿胀。两组在术中失血量方面无显著差异;然而,放置引流管的组比未放置引流管的组明显更频繁地需要输血(分别为171例中的98例[57.3%]和193例中的83例[43%])。在需要输血的患者中,有伤口引流管的患者比没有引流管的患者需要显著更多的血液(男性患者每人输血1.12次对0.62次;女性患者每人输血1.73次对1.03次)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验