Kockelbergh R C, Harris A M, John R M, Bailey J S, Firmin R K
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Groby Road Hospital, Leicester.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Jan;76(1):30-2.
A series of 180 patients was randomised to two groups after median sternotomy performed for cardiac surgery in order to evaluate the effect of suction drainage on serous wound discharge. In group A all wounds were drained using two conventional mediastinal drains, while in group B one suction drain and one conventional mediastinal drain were employed. Five patients developed serous wound discharge in group B compared with 14 in group A (chi 2, P < 0.02). There were no significant differences between the rates of major wound infection (group A, n = 1; group B, n = 1) or the incidence of postoperative pericardial effusion assessed by echocardiography (group A, n = 10; group B, n = 5).
为评估吸引引流对伤口浆液性渗出的影响,对180例行心脏手术正中开胸的患者进行随机分组。A组所有伤口均使用两根传统纵隔引流管引流,而B组采用一根吸引引流管和一根传统纵隔引流管。B组有5例患者出现伤口浆液性渗出,而A组有14例(χ²检验,P<0.02)。两组在主要伤口感染率(A组,n = 1;B组,n = 1)或通过超声心动图评估的术后心包积液发生率(A组,n = 10;B组,n = 5)方面无显著差异。