• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以医生为导向的干预措施对结直肠癌筛查随访的影响。

Impact of a physician-oriented intervention on follow-up in colorectal cancer screening.

作者信息

Myers Ronald E, Turner Barbara, Weinberg David, Hyslop Terry, Hauck Walter W, Brigham Timothy, Rothermel Todd, Grana James, Schlackman Neil

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2004 Apr;38(4):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.010.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.010
PMID:15020170
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complete diagnostic evaluation or CDE (i.e., colonoscopy or combined flexible sigmoidoscopy plus barium enema X-ray) is often not performed for persons with an abnormal screening fecal occult blood test (FOBT+) result.

METHOD

This study evaluated the impact of a reminder-feedback and educational outreach intervention on primary care practice CDE recommendation and performance rates. Four hundred seventy primary care physicians (PCPs) in 318 practices participated in the study. Patients were mailed an FOBT kit annually as part of a screening program. Practices were randomly assigned to a Control Group (N = 198) or an Intervention Group (N = 120). During an 18-month pre-randomization period and a 9-month post-randomization period, 2992 screening FOBT+ patients were identified. Intervention practices received the screening program and the intervention. Control practices received only the screening program. Study outcomes were baseline-adjusted CDE recommendation and performance rates.

RESULTS

At baseline, about two-thirds of FOBT+ patients received a CDE recommendation, and about half had a CDE performed. At endpoint, CDE recommendation and performance rates were both significantly higher for the Intervention as compared to the Control practices (OR = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.37, 3.78, and OR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.50, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The reminder-feedback plus educational outreach intervention significantly increased CDE recommendation and performance.

摘要

背景

对于粪便潜血试验筛查结果异常(FOBT+)的患者,通常不进行完整的诊断评估或CDE(即结肠镜检查或柔性乙状结肠镜检查加钡灌肠X线检查)。

方法

本研究评估了提醒-反馈和教育外展干预对初级保健机构CDE推荐率和执行率的影响。318家机构的470名初级保健医生(PCP)参与了研究。作为筛查项目的一部分,每年向患者邮寄一份FOBT检测试剂盒。机构被随机分为对照组(N = 198)或干预组(N = 120)。在18个月的随机分组前期和9个月的随机分组后期,共识别出2992名FOBT+筛查患者。干预组机构接受筛查项目和干预措施。对照组机构仅接受筛查项目。研究结果为经基线调整的CDE推荐率和执行率。

结果

在基线时,约三分之二的FOBT+患者收到了CDE推荐,约一半的患者接受了CDE检查。在研究终点,与对照组相比,干预组的CDE推荐率和执行率均显著更高(OR = 2.28;95%CI:1.37,3.78;以及OR = 1.63;95%CI:1.06,2.50)。

结论

提醒-反馈加教育外展干预显著提高了CDE推荐率和执行率。

相似文献

1
Impact of a physician-oriented intervention on follow-up in colorectal cancer screening.以医生为导向的干预措施对结直肠癌筛查随访的影响。
Prev Med. 2004 Apr;38(4):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.010.
2
Complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening: research design and baseline findings.结直肠癌筛查中的完整诊断评估:研究设计与基线结果
Prev Med. 2001 Oct;33(4):249-60. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0878.
3
Physician intention to recommend complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening.医生在结直肠癌筛查中推荐进行全面诊断评估的意向。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Jul;8(7):587-93.
4
Measuring complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening.衡量结直肠癌筛查中的完整诊断评估。
Cancer Detect Prev. 2001;25(2):174-82.
5
Physician-reported reasons for limited follow-up of patients with a positive fecal occult blood test screening result.医生报告的粪便潜血试验筛查结果呈阳性患者随访受限的原因。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Sep;98(9):2078-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07575.x.
6
The role of family physicians in increasing annual fecal occult blood test screening coverage: a prospective intervention study.家庭医生在提高年度粪便潜血试验筛查覆盖率中的作用:一项前瞻性干预研究。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Jun;4(6):424-5.
7
Validity of four self-reported colorectal cancer screening modalities in a general population: differences over time and by intervention assignment.一般人群中四种自我报告的结直肠癌筛查方式的有效性:随时间变化及干预分配的差异
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr;17(4):777-84. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0441. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
8
Physician recommendations for follow-up of positive fecal occult blood tests.医生对粪便潜血试验阳性后续检查的建议。
Med Care Res Rev. 2005 Feb;62(1):79-110. doi: 10.1177/1077558704271725.
9
Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates.结直肠癌不同筛查策略的随机试验:患者反应及检出率
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):347-57. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji050.
10
A provider intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening in county health centers.一项在县卫生中心改善结直肠癌筛查的提供者干预措施。
Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S109-16. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817d3fcf.

引用本文的文献

1
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
2
Exploring the content and delivery of feedback facilitation co-interventions: a systematic review.探索反馈促进共同干预的内容和实施方式:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2024 May 28;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01365-9.
3
Abnormal Colorectal Cancer Test Follow-Up: A Quality Improvement Initiative at a Federally Qualified Health Center.结直肠癌检测异常的后续处理:一家联邦合格健康中心的质量改进计划。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241242571. doi: 10.1177/21501319241242571.
4
Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-up through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) in Appalachia: protocol for a group randomized, delayed intervention trial.通过实施科学(ACCSIS)在阿巴拉契亚加速结直肠癌筛查和随访:一项群组随机、延迟干预试验的方案。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Sep 28;13(10):748-756. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad017.
5
Synthesis of Existent Oncology Curricula for Primary Care Providers: A Scoping Review With a Global Equity Lens.基层医疗照护者现有肿瘤学课程的综合:从全球公平视角进行的范围综述。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 May;9:e2200298. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00298.
6
Persistent Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion Amid Centralized Outreach: A Mixed Methods Study.集中外展活动中仍存在结直肠癌筛查完成的持续障碍:一项混合方法研究。
Am J Health Promot. 2022 May;36(4):697-705. doi: 10.1177/08901171211064492. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
7
Factors affecting the follow-up time after a positive result in the fecal occult blood test.影响粪便潜血试验阳性结果后随访时间的因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 5;16(10):e0258130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258130. eCollection 2021.
8
Development of a multilevel intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in Appalachia.开发一项多层次干预措施以提高阿巴拉契亚地区的结直肠癌筛查率。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 May 19;2(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00151-8.
9
Low Rates of Colonoscopy Follow-up After a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test in a Medicaid Health Plan Delivered Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.在一个由医疗补助计划提供的邮寄结直肠癌筛查计划中,粪便免疫化学检测阳性后的结肠镜检查随访率较低。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720958525. doi: 10.1177/2150132720958525.
10
What Multilevel Interventions Do We Need to Increase the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate to 80%?我们需要采取哪些多层次干预措施才能将结直肠癌筛查率提高到 80%?
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Apr;19(4):633-645. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.016. Epub 2019 Dec 27.