• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肌筋膜疼痛患者的颞下颌关节病变:基于特定标准集的磁共振成像与临床检查的对比分析

Temporomandibular joint pathosis in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and a clinical examination based on a specific set of criteria.

作者信息

Schmitter Marc, Kress Bodo, Rammelsberg Peter

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Mar;97(3):318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.10.009.

DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.10.009
PMID:15024353
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the prevalence of joint diseases in patients with either of 2 forms of myofascial pain (with and without limited mouth opening) and to verify the accuracy of temporomandibular joint-related clinical diagnoses through the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

STUDY DESIGN

On the basis of the results of a clinical examination carried out according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), 61 patients were divided into 2 subgroups. The first group consisted of 36 patients who had myofascial pain with limited mouth opening (MPLO), whereas the other 25 patients were diagnosed with myofascial pain without limited mouth opening. MRI was carried out on all patients. The clinical joint-related diagnoses from RDC/TMD were compared with MRI results.

RESULTS

Patients with MPLO often had joint diseases that were not detected by means of a clinical examination alone. The kappa statistic was used to compare MRI and clinical diagnoses, confirming poor agreement in patients with MPLO (kappa=0.13) and acceptable agreement in patients with myofascial pain without limited mouth opening (kappa=0.72).

CONCLUSION

Restricted mandibular mobility is frequently associated with temporomandibular joint diseases that were not identified during a clinical examination. Therefore, an adaptation of the classification scheme used for the RDC/TMDs may result in the improvement of the sensitivity of clinical joint-related diagnoses, especially in patients with MPLO.

摘要

目的

我们试图确定两种形式的肌筋膜疼痛(伴或不伴张口受限)患者中关节疾病的患病率,并通过使用磁共振成像(MRI)来验证颞下颌关节相关临床诊断的准确性。

研究设计

根据颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD)进行临床检查的结果,将61例患者分为2个亚组。第一组由36例伴有张口受限的肌筋膜疼痛(MPLO)患者组成,而另外25例患者被诊断为不伴有张口受限的肌筋膜疼痛。对所有患者进行了MRI检查。将RDC/TMD的临床关节相关诊断与MRI结果进行比较。

结果

MPLO患者常患有仅通过临床检查无法检测到的关节疾病。使用kappa统计量比较MRI和临床诊断,结果证实MPLO患者的一致性较差(kappa=0.13),而不伴有张口受限的肌筋膜疼痛患者的一致性尚可(kappa=0.72)。

结论

下颌运动受限常与临床检查中未发现的颞下颌关节疾病相关。因此,调整用于RDC/TMD的分类方案可能会提高临床关节相关诊断的敏感性,尤其是在MPLO患者中。

相似文献

1
Temporomandibular joint pathosis in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and a clinical examination based on a specific set of criteria.肌筋膜疼痛患者的颞下颌关节病变:基于特定标准集的磁共振成像与临床检查的对比分析
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Mar;97(3):318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.10.009.
2
Recalibration improves inter-examiner reliability of TMD examination.重新校准可提高颞下颌关节紊乱病检查中检查者之间的可靠性。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2006 Jun;64(3):146-52. doi: 10.1080/00016350500483137.
3
Correlation between clinical diagnosis based on RDC/TMD and MRI findings of TMJ internal derangement.基于 RDC/TMD 的临床诊断与 TMJ 内部紊乱的 MRI 发现之间的相关性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jan;41(1):103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.09.010. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
4
The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. V: methods used to establish and validate revised Axis I diagnostic algorithms.颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准。V:用于建立和验证修订后的轴I诊断算法的方法。
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter;24(1):63-78.
5
Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†.颞下颌关节紊乱病(DC/TMD)的诊断标准(临床与研究用):国际 RDC/TMD 联合会*和口腔颌面痛特别兴趣小组†的推荐标准。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151.
6
Temporomandibular joint disorders' impact on pain, function, and disability.颞下颌关节紊乱症对疼痛、功能和残疾的影响。
J Dent Res. 2015 Mar;94(3 Suppl):79S-86S. doi: 10.1177/0022034514565793. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
7
Adapting the diagnostic definitions of the RDC/TMD to routine clinical practice: a feasibility study.将 RDC/TMD 的诊断定义改编为常规临床实践:一项可行性研究。
J Dent. 2009 Dec;37(12):955-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
8
Resilient appliance therapy of temporomandibular disorders. Subdiagnoses, sense of coherence and treatment outcome.颞下颌关节紊乱病的弹性矫治器治疗。亚诊断、连贯感与治疗结果。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2010(206):9-88.
9
Association between temporomandibular joint symptoms, signs, and clinical diagnosis using the RDC/TMD and radiographic findings in temporomandibular joint tomograms.颞下颌关节症状、体征与采用RDC/TMD进行的临床诊断以及颞下颌关节断层扫描影像学表现之间的关联
J Orofac Pain. 2008 Summer;22(3):239-51.
10
The Research Diagnostic Criteria For Temporomandibular Disorders. II: reliability of Axis I diagnoses and selected clinical measures.颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准。II:I轴诊断及选定临床测量指标的可靠性
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter;24(1):25-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonsurgical management of temporomandibular joint autoimmune disorders.颞下颌关节自身免疫性疾病的非手术治疗
AIMS Public Health. 2019 Dec 12;6(4):554-567. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.4.554. eCollection 2019.
2
The Diagnostic Validity of Clinical Tests in Temporomandibular Internal Derangement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.颞下颌关节内紊乱症临床检查的诊断效度:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Physiother Can. 2012 Spring;64(2):116-34. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2010-54. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
3
A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence.
一种用于评估患病率研究质量的新工具。
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Jun;16(3):781-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0557-4. Epub 2011 May 19.
4
Correlation of RDC/TMD axis I diagnoses and axis II pain-related disability. A multicenter study.RDC/TMD 轴 I 诊断与轴 II 疼痛相关残疾的相关性。一项多中心研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Oct;15(5):749-56. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0444-4. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
5
The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. V: methods used to establish and validate revised Axis I diagnostic algorithms.颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准。V:用于建立和验证修订后的轴I诊断算法的方法。
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter;24(1):63-78.
6
The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. III: validity of Axis I diagnoses.颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准。III:I轴诊断的有效性。
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter;24(1):35-47.
7
The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. I: overview and methodology for assessment of validity.颞下颌关节紊乱病的研究诊断标准。I:有效性评估的概述与方法
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter;24(1):7-24.