Suppr超能文献

门诊膝关节镜检查中双侧与单侧脊髓麻醉的比较。

Bilateral vs. unilateral spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopies.

作者信息

Esmaoglu Aliye, Karaoglu Sinan, Mizrak Ayse, Boyaci Adem

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004 Mar;12(2):155-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-003-0350-2. Epub 2003 Feb 22.

Abstract

This prospective randomized study compared unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia with respect to intraoperative and postoperative complications, and time to discharge from hospital for knee arthroscopies in outpatients. We studied 70 ASA I patients scheduled for elective outpatient knee arthroscopy. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups to receive either 3 ml (15 mg) 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (bilateral group) or 1.5 ml (7.5 mg) 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (unilateral group). The duration of motor and sensory block and the time to discharge from the hospital were all recorded. Perioperative complications such as hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, if present, were recorded. The patients were interviewed by telephone 7 days later, and each patient was asked about headache or backache. The duration of motor and sensory block, and the time to discharge from hospital was shorter in the unilateral group than in the bilateral group. Three patients in the bilateral group were treated for hypotension. Bradycardia occurred in two patients in the bilateral group, and three patients required temporary bladder catheterization due to delay in recovery of spontaneous urination. Nausea and vomiting occurred in three patients in bilateral group. Nine patients in the bilateral group and six patients in the unilateral group developed postspinal headache. Backache occurred in five patients in the bilateral group and in six patients in the unilateral group. Our data indicate that the use of unilateral spinal block is a suitable technique for knee arthroscopies in outpatients.

摘要

这项前瞻性随机研究比较了单侧和双侧脊髓麻醉在门诊膝关节镜手术中的术中及术后并发症,以及出院时间。我们研究了70例计划行择期门诊膝关节镜手术的ASA I级患者。患者被随机分为两组,分别接受3 ml(15 mg)0.5%的高压布比卡因(双侧组)或1.5 ml(7.5 mg)0.5%的高压布比卡因(单侧组)。记录运动和感觉阻滞的持续时间以及出院时间。记录围手术期并发症,如低血压、心动过缓、恶心、呕吐、尿潴留(若有)。7天后通过电话对患者进行访谈,询问每位患者是否有头痛或背痛。单侧组的运动和感觉阻滞持续时间以及出院时间均短于双侧组。双侧组有3例患者因低血压接受治疗。双侧组有2例患者发生心动过缓,3例患者因自主排尿恢复延迟需要临时导尿。双侧组有3例患者出现恶心和呕吐。双侧组有9例患者、单侧组有6例患者发生脊髓穿刺后头痛。双侧组有5例患者、单侧组有6例患者出现背痛。我们的数据表明,单侧脊髓阻滞是门诊膝关节镜手术的一种合适技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验