• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西咪替丁按需治疗消化不良。随机对照单受试者试验的经验。

Cimetidine on-demand in dyspepsia. Experience with randomized controlled single-subject trials.

作者信息

Johannessen T, Petersen H, Kristensen P, Fosstvedt D, Kleveland P M, Dybdahl J, Løge I

机构信息

Dept. of Community Medicine and General Practice, University of Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 1992;27(3):189-95. doi: 10.3109/00365529208999947.

DOI:10.3109/00365529208999947
PMID:1502480
Abstract

Double-blind randomized controlled trials in single subjects (N of 1 RCTs) have demonstrated a beneficial symptomatic effect of cimetidine in reflux- or ulcer-like non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD). However, spontaneous fluctuations in symptoms reduce the validity of such trials when performed as continuous trials with fixed dosages. This study was carried out to identify individual responders to cimetidine in NUD, peptic ulcer disease, and oesophagitis and to confirm the beneficial average effect of cimetidine in these clinical entities. We evaluated N of 1 multi-crossover trial designs, which compare the effects of single doses of cimetidine and placebo taken on-demand for symptomatic relief. Each trial consisted of six cimetidine (400 mg or 800 mg) and six placebo tablets randomized in successive pairs. The symptomatic effect of each tablet was measured 1/2-6 h after the intake. Outcomes were assessed by individual p values and confidence intervals. A minimal clinically important difference was defined, to assess the clinical significance as demonstrated by the confidence intervals. Thirteen of 25 patients (52%) with reflux- and ulcer-like NUD obtained individual p values below 0.20. Similarly, 7 of 9 patients (78%) with oesophagitis and 6 of 12 patients (50%) with peptic ulcer obtained such p values. On the basis of the 80% confidence intervals the corresponding numbers of subjects with clinically significant effect were six (NUD), three, and three. The combined data showed a significantly better effect of cimetidine than of placebo (p less than 0.0001) in each of the three diagnostic groups studied. Cimetidine taken on-demand may have a rapid symptom-relieving effect in dyspepsia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

针对单一个体的双盲随机对照试验(单例随机对照试验,N-of-1 RCTs)已证明西咪替丁对反流样或溃疡样非溃疡性消化不良(NUD)有有益的症状改善作用。然而,当以固定剂量进行连续试验时,症状的自发波动会降低此类试验的有效性。本研究旨在确定NUD、消化性溃疡疾病和食管炎患者中对西咪替丁有反应的个体,并证实西咪替丁在这些临床病症中的有益平均效应。我们评估了N-of-1多交叉试验设计,该设计比较按需服用单剂量西咪替丁和安慰剂以缓解症状的效果。每个试验包括六片西咪替丁(400毫克或800毫克)和六片安慰剂,依次成对随机排列。每片药服用后1/2至6小时测量其症状改善效果。通过个体p值和置信区间评估结果。定义了最小临床重要差异,以评估置信区间所显示的临床意义。25例反流样和溃疡样NUD患者中有13例(52%)个体p值低于0.20。同样,9例食管炎患者中有7例(78%)和12例消化性溃疡患者中有6例(50%)获得了这样的p值。根据80%置信区间,具有临床显著效果的相应受试者数量分别为6例(NUD)、3例和3例。合并数据显示,在所研究的三个诊断组中,西咪替丁的效果均显著优于安慰剂(p<0.0001)。按需服用西咪替丁可能对消化不良有快速缓解症状的作用。(摘要截取自250字)

相似文献

1
Cimetidine on-demand in dyspepsia. Experience with randomized controlled single-subject trials.西咪替丁按需治疗消化不良。随机对照单受试者试验的经验。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1992;27(3):189-95. doi: 10.3109/00365529208999947.
2
The symptomatic effect of 1-day treatment periods with cimetidine in dyspepsia. Combined results from randomized, controlled, single-subject trials.西咪替丁一日治疗期对消化不良的症状性疗效。随机对照单受试者试验的综合结果。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1991 Sep;26(9):974-80. doi: 10.3109/00365529108996251.
3
The effect of cimetidine in non-ulcer dyspepsia. Experience with a multi-cross-over model.西咪替丁治疗非溃疡性消化不良的效果。多交叉模型的经验。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1985 Jan;20(1):19-24. doi: 10.3109/00365528509089627.
4
Effect of cimetidine in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and erosive prepyloric changes.西咪替丁对非溃疡性消化不良和幽门前糜烂性改变患者的疗效。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1985 Jun;20(5):629-35. doi: 10.3109/00365528509089708.
5
Cimetidine in the treatment of non-ulcer dyspepsia: results of a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study.西咪替丁治疗非溃疡性消化不良:一项随机双盲、安慰剂对照研究的结果
Curr Med Res Opin. 1989;11(6):390-7. doi: 10.1185/03007998909110140.
6
Controlled clinical trial of treatment with cimetidine for non-ulcer dyspepsia.西咪替丁治疗非溃疡性消化不良的对照临床试验。
Acta Med Scand. 1985;217(3):281-7. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1985.tb02696.x.
7
Cimetidine responders in non-ulcer dyspepsia.非溃疡性消化不良中的西咪替丁反应者。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1988 Apr;23(3):327-36. doi: 10.3109/00365528809093874.
8
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of cimetidine and pirenzepine in nonulcer dyspepsia.西咪替丁和哌仑西平治疗非溃疡性消化不良的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照交叉试验。
Gastroenterology. 1986 Jul;91(1):149-56. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90451-8.
9
Treatment with cimetidine, antacid, or placebo in patients with dyspepsia of unknown origin.用西咪替丁、抗酸剂或安慰剂治疗病因不明的消化不良患者。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1988 Jan;23(1):7-18. doi: 10.3109/00365528809093840.
10
Controlled trials in gastrodyspepsia: a methodological aspect.
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1985;109:153-8. doi: 10.3109/00365528509103951.

引用本文的文献

1
A Randomized Placebo-Controlled -of-1 Trial: The Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitor in the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.质子泵抑制剂治疗胃食管反流病的随机安慰剂对照 1 期试验。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec 12;2019:3926051. doi: 10.1155/2019/3926051. eCollection 2019.
2
Evaluation of person-level heterogeneity of treatment effects in published multiperson N-of-1 studies: systematic review and reanalysis.评价已发表的多人 N-of-1 研究中治疗效果的个体间异质性:系统评价和重新分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 26;8(5):e017641. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017641.
3
A randomized open-label trial of on-demand rabeprazole vs ranitidine for patients with non-erosive reflux disease.
按需雷贝拉唑与雷尼替丁治疗非糜烂性反流病患者的随机开放标签试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 May 21;18(19):2390-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i19.2390.
4
Individual (N-of-1) trials can be combined to give population comparative treatment effect estimates: methodologic considerations.个体(n-of-1)试验可以合并以给出人群比较治疗效果估计:方法学考虑。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;63(12):1312-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.020. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
5
H(2) receptor antagonists and prokinetics in dyspepsia: a critical review.消化不良中H2受体拮抗剂和促动力药:一篇批判性综述
Gut. 2002 May;50 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv58-62. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.suppl_4.iv58.
6
Long-term prescribing of proton pump inhibitors in general practice.全科医疗中质子泵抑制剂的长期处方
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):451-3.
7
Randomised study of n of 1 trials versus standard practice.n-of-1试验与标准治疗方法的随机对照研究。
BMJ. 1996 Apr 27;312(7038):1069-74. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7038.1069.
8
Functional dyspepsia. Current treatment recommendations.功能性消化不良。当前的治疗建议。
Drugs. 1993 Jun;45(6):918-930. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345060-00005.