Hekimoglu C, Anil N, Yalçin E
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Mar;31(3):265-9. doi: 10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01220.x.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microleakage characteristics of laminate veneers with different incisal edge preparation. Two groups of 20 extracted human maxillary central incisors were used for fabricating laminate veneers. The cervical margin of all veneers were placed 1 mm above the cementoenamel junction. The incisal finish line of 20 teeth was placed at the incisal edge (window type preparation). The incisal finish line of the other 20 teeth was placed linguoincisally (incisal edge overlapped type preparation). All veneers were fabricated according to the manufacturer's instructions with vacuum fired porcelain and cemented with dual-cure resin cement. The autoradiographic method was used for determination of microleakages. Microleakages at the interface of the laminate veneer and tooth were determined according to the scale described in the manuscript. Mc Nemar test was used for comparison of microleakages at cervical margins. Microleakage grades at other areas were compared in percentage. In the two preparation types the cervical microleakages were of similar degree. The incisal microleakages in the overlapped laminate veneers were greater than in the window type veneers. In conclusion, the window preparation type was more effective in terms of prevention of microleakage at the incisal margin than the overlapped type laminates.
本研究的目的是评估不同切缘预备的贴面的微渗漏特征。使用两组各20颗拔除的人上颌中切牙制作贴面。所有贴面的颈缘均置于牙骨质釉质界上方1mm处。20颗牙齿的切端完成线置于切缘(开窗型预备)。另外20颗牙齿的切端完成线置于舌侧切端(切缘重叠型预备)。所有贴面均按照制造商的说明用真空烤瓷制作,并用双固化树脂水门汀粘结。采用放射自显影法测定微渗漏情况。根据手稿中描述的标准确定贴面与牙齿界面处的微渗漏。采用Mc Nemar检验比较颈缘处的微渗漏情况。其他区域的微渗漏等级以百分比进行比较。在两种预备类型中,颈部微渗漏程度相似。重叠型贴面的切端微渗漏大于开窗型贴面。总之,就预防切缘处的微渗漏而言,开窗预备型比重叠型贴面更有效。