Schipper Louis A, Barkle Gregory F, Hadfield John C, Vojvodic-Vukovic Maja, Burgess Craig P
Landcare Research NZ Ltd., Private Bag 3127, Hamilton, New Zealand.
J Contam Hydrol. 2004 Apr;69(3-4):263-79. doi: 10.1016/S0169-7722(03)00157-8.
Denitrification walls are a practical approach for decreasing non-point source pollution of surface waters. They are constructed by digging a trench perpendicular to groundwater flow and mixing the aquifer material with organic matter, such as sawdust, which acts as a carbon source to stimulate denitrification. For efficient functioning, walls need to be permeable to groundwater flow. We examined the functioning of a denitrification wall constructed in an aquifer consisting of coarse sands. Wells were monitored for changes in nitrate concentration as groundwater passed through the wall and soil samples were taken to measure microbial parameters inside the wall. Nitrate concentrations upstream of the wall ranged from 21 to 39 g N m(-3), in the wall from 0 to 2 g N m(-3) and downstream from 19 to 44 g N m(-3). An initial groundwater flow investigation using a salt tracer dilution technique showed that the flow through the wall was less than 4% of the flow occurring in the aquifer. Natural gradient tracer tests using bromide and Rhodamine-WT confirmed groundwater bypass under the wall. Hydraulic conductivity of 0.48 m day(-1) was measured inside the wall, whereas the surrounding aquifer had a hydraulic conductivity of 65.4 m day(-1). This indicated that during construction of the wall, hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer had been greatly reduced, so that most of the groundwater flowed under rather than through the wall. Denitrification rates measured in the center of the wall ranged from 0.020 to 0.13 g N m(-3) day(-1), which did not account for the rates of nitrate removal (0.16-0.29 g N m(-3) day(-1)) calculated from monitoring of groundwater nitrate concentrations. This suggested that the rate of denitrification was greater at the upstream face of the wall than in its center where it was limited by low nitrate concentrations. While denitrification walls can be an inexpensive tool for removing nitrate from groundwater, they may not be suitable in aquifers with coarse textured subsoils where simple inexpensive construction techniques result in major decreases in hydraulic conductivity.
反硝化墙是减少地表水非点源污染的一种实用方法。它们通过挖掘垂直于地下水流的沟渠,并将含水层物质与诸如锯末等有机物质混合来构建,锯末作为碳源以刺激反硝化作用。为实现高效运行,墙体需要对地下水流具有渗透性。我们研究了在由粗砂构成的含水层中构建的反硝化墙的运行情况。在地下水穿过墙体时,对井中的硝酸盐浓度变化进行监测,并采集土壤样本以测量墙体内的微生物参数。墙体上游的硝酸盐浓度范围为21至39克氮/立方米,墙体内为0至2克氮/立方米,下游为19至44克氮/立方米。最初使用盐示踪剂稀释技术进行的地下水流调查表明,通过墙体的流量小于含水层中流量的4%。使用溴化物和若丹明-WT进行的自然梯度示踪剂测试证实了墙体下方存在地下水绕过现象。在墙体内测得的水力传导率为0.48米/天,而周围含水层的水力传导率为65.4米/天。这表明在墙体建造过程中,含水层的水力传导率大幅降低,以至于大部分地下水是从墙体下方流过而非穿过墙体。在墙体中心测得的反硝化速率范围为0.020至0.13克氮/立方米·天,这与根据地下水硝酸盐浓度监测计算出的硝酸盐去除速率(0.16 - 0.29克氮/立方米·天)不符。这表明墙体上游面的反硝化速率高于墙体中心,墙体中心的反硝化速率受低硝酸盐浓度限制。虽然反硝化墙可能是从地下水中去除硝酸盐的一种廉价工具,但它们可能不适用于底土质地粗糙的含水层,在这种含水层中,简单廉价的建造技术会导致水力传导率大幅下降。