Suppr超能文献

伴有严重间质水肿和富含浆细胞浸润的急性肾移植排斥反应:高γ干扰素表达与不良临床预后。

Acute renal allograft rejections with major interstitial oedema and plasma cell-rich infiltrates: high gamma-interferon expression and poor clinical outcome.

作者信息

Desvaux Dominique, Le Gouvello Sabine, Pastural Myriam, Abtahi Mahdi, Suberbielle Caroline, Boeri Nicole, Rémy Philippe, Salomon Laurent, Lang Philippe, Baron Christophe

机构信息

Service de Néphrologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 51 Avenue du Marechal de Lattre Tassigny, F-94000 Créteil, France.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Apr;19(4):933-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh027.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute rejections are scored according to three main criteria: vasculitis, tubulitis and interstitial infiltration as defined in the Banff classification. Typically, B cells account for <8% of the infiltrates and oedema is limited. The clinical significance of severe interstitial oedema and plasma cell-rich infiltrates (OPcR) are still a matter of debate.

METHODS

Kidney graft biopsies performed between 1991 and 1998 were retrospectively evaluated for these two criteria.

RESULTS

Among the 826 biopsies performed during the study period, 14 samples in 12 patients met these criteria; 11 were of Banff type I acute rejection and three were borderline. Based on clinical data, all were treated as acute rejections. OPcR occurred at a median of 187 days post-transplantation. All episodes were steroid resistant. Graft survival was 40% at 1 year following the rejection. Circulating antibodies reactive either to donor HLA or to endothelial cells were present in eight of 12 patients and widespread C4d deposit in peritubular capillary were present in three out of five patients studied. Level of gamma-interferon mRNA within the graft was significantly higher than in standard acute cellular rejection (ACR).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that OPcR rejections portend a poor outcome irrespective of the Banff score. Our data strongly support the hypothesis that a humoral component participated in the graft injuries. Altogether, the data suggest that OPcR rejection might represent a late and attenuated variant of acute humoral rejection that should be classified separately from ACR.

摘要

背景

急性排斥反应根据三个主要标准进行评分:血管炎、肾小管炎和间质浸润,如班夫分类中所定义。通常,B细胞占浸润细胞的比例小于8%,且水肿有限。严重间质水肿和富含浆细胞的浸润(OPcR)的临床意义仍存在争议。

方法

对1991年至1998年间进行的肾移植活检进行回顾性评估,以确定这两个标准。

结果

在研究期间进行的826例活检中,12例患者的14个样本符合这些标准;11例为班夫I型急性排斥反应,3例为临界病例。根据临床数据,所有病例均按急性排斥反应进行治疗。OPcR发生在移植后的中位时间为187天。所有发作均对类固醇耐药。排斥反应后1年的移植物存活率为40%。12例患者中有8例存在针对供体HLA或内皮细胞的循环抗体,5例研究患者中有3例在肾小管周围毛细血管中存在广泛的C4d沉积。移植物内γ-干扰素mRNA水平显著高于标准急性细胞排斥反应(ACR)。

结论

本研究表明,无论班夫评分如何,OPcR排斥反应预后不良。我们的数据有力支持了体液成分参与移植物损伤的假说。总之,数据表明OPcR排斥反应可能代表急性体液排斥反应的晚期和减弱变体,应与ACR分开分类。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验