• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验中的子宫托:临床医生进行适配是否必要?

Diaphragms in clinical trials: is clinician fitting necessary?

作者信息

Mauck Christine, Lai Jaim-Jou, Schwartz Jill, Weiner Debra H

机构信息

CONRAD, 1611 Kent Street, No. 806, Arlington, VA 22209, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2004 Apr;69(4):263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.11.006.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2003.11.006
PMID:15033398
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The need for fitting a contraceptive diaphragm has recently been questioned in the context of upcoming trials in which the ability of the diaphragm to prevent sexually transmitted infections will be tested. Being able to provide the same size device to all women would greatly simplify supplying the device and training the clinicians, provided that it does not compromise effectiveness.

METHODS

Data from studies of Lea's Shield and FemCap, in which all women were sized for a standard diaphragm and half were randomized to use it during the studies, were reanalyzed to determine if it was feasible to give all women in a barrier study the same size diaphragm or, alternatively, to determine if diaphragm size could be predicted using an algorithm of one or more parameters.

RESULTS

If all women received a size 70 diaphragm, rather than being fitted by a clinician, 33.2% would receive the same size that they would have received if they had been fitted by a clinician. If the definition of a "correct" fit were broadened to include one size larger or smaller than what the clinician would have prescribed, 78.0% would be "correctly" fitted. Using an algorithm that considered parity, body weight and other factors did not improve results.

CONCLUSION

It would be acceptable to conduct a trial in which all women receive a size 70 diaphragm, provided that all women are sized; that safety, effectiveness and acceptability are closely monitored and that study results are stratified by the diaphragm size determined by clinician fitting. It would also be informative to use sized diaphragms as the comparator in studies of new single-size devices.

摘要

背景

在即将开展的试验中,避孕隔膜预防性传播感染的能力将接受测试,在此背景下,近期有人对是否有必要进行避孕隔膜适配提出质疑。倘若不影响避孕效果,能够为所有女性提供相同尺寸的避孕隔膜将极大地简化该器械的供应及临床医生的培训工作。

方法

重新分析利氏避孕隔膜(Lea's Shield)和费姆卡普避孕帽(FemCap)的研究数据,这些研究中所有女性均按标准隔膜尺寸进行测量,且一半女性在研究期间被随机分配使用该隔膜,以确定在屏障法研究中为所有女性提供相同尺寸的隔膜是否可行,或者确定是否可以使用一个或多个参数的算法来预测隔膜尺寸。

结果

如果所有女性均使用70号隔膜,而非由临床医生进行适配,那么33.2%的女性将获得与由临床医生适配时相同尺寸的隔膜。如果将“正确”适配的定义扩大到包括比临床医生所开尺寸大一号或小一号的情况,那么78.0%的女性将得到“正确”适配。使用考虑了生育情况、体重及其他因素的算法并未改善结果。

结论

开展一项所有女性均使用70号隔膜的试验是可行的,前提是对所有女性进行尺寸测量;密切监测安全性、有效性和可接受性,并且研究结果按临床医生适配确定的隔膜尺寸进行分层。在新型单尺寸器械的研究中,将尺寸适配的隔膜用作对照也会很有意义。

相似文献

1
Diaphragms in clinical trials: is clinician fitting necessary?临床试验中的子宫托:临床医生进行适配是否必要?
Contraception. 2004 Apr;69(4):263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.11.006.
2
Lea's Shield: a study of the safety and efficacy of a new vaginal barrier contraceptive used with and without spermicide.利氏屏障:一项关于一种新型阴道屏障避孕法在使用和不使用杀精剂情况下的安全性和有效性的研究。
Contraception. 1996 Jun;53(6):329-35. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(96)00081-9.
3
Lea's Shield contraceptive device: pilot study of its short-term patient acceptability and aspects of use.利氏避孕器:关于其短期患者可接受性及使用方面的初步研究。
Br J Fam Plann. 1999 Jan;24(4):117-20.
4
New device, "Lea's Shield," being evaluated in studies.新型设备“莉娅护盾”正在研究中进行评估。
Contracept Technol Update. 1991 Jul;12(7):110-1.
5
Relationship of weight change to required size of vaginal diaphragm.
Nurse Pract. 1982 Jul-Aug;7(7):21, 25.
6
Comparative acceptability of the SILCS and Ortho ALL-FLEX diaphragms among couples in the Dominican Republic.多米尼加共和国夫妇对SILCS隔膜和Ortho ALL-FLEX隔膜的可接受性比较
Contraception. 2008 Nov;78(5):418-23. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
7
SILCS diaphragm: postcoital testing of a new single-size contraceptive device.SILCS隔膜:一种新型单一尺寸避孕装置的性交后测试
Contraception. 2008 Sep;78(3):237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.04.118. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
8
Evidence-based planning of a randomized controlled trial on diaphragm use for prevention of sexually transmitted infections.关于使用隔膜预防性传播感染的随机对照试验的循证规划。
Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Mar;35(3):238-42. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31815abaa2.
9
Comparison of diaphragm and combined oral contraceptive pill users in the Australian family planning setting.澳大利亚计划生育环境中使用膈膜与复方口服避孕药的使用者比较。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007 Mar;12(1):24-9. doi: 10.1080/13625180601045337.
10
Fitting the cervical cap.佩戴宫颈帽。
Nurse Pract. 1988 Jul;13(7):49-50, 52, 55.