Suppr超能文献

比较Filshie夹与Pomeroy技术用于产后及术中剖宫产输卵管绝育术围手术期结局的随机试验:一项初步研究。

Randomized trial to compare perioperative outcomes of Filshie clip vs. Pomeroy technique for postpartum and intraoperative cesarean tubal sterilization: a pilot study.

作者信息

Kohaut Bettina A, Musselman B Lynn, Sanchez-Ramos Luis, Kaunitz Andrew M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida Health Science Center/Jacksonville, 3627 University Boulevard South, Suite #355, Jacksonville, FL 32216, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2004 Apr;69(4):267-70. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.12.007.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare, by conducting a randomized trial, Filshie clip and Pomeroy techniques for postpartum and intrapartum cesarean sterilizations in a United States teaching hospital with respect to surgeon preference and perioperative outcomes.

METHOD

Thirty-two obstetric patients consented for sterilization were randomized to Pomeroy technique or Filshie clip placement. Following the surgical procedure, surgeons and operating room technicians completed a survey regarding their experience with the procedures and preference. Patient demographic data, time for procedure and follow-up visits were obtained by chart review.

RESULTS

For most postpartum sterilizations, the mean duration of the procedure was almost 7 min faster for the Filshie clip technique (p = 0.08); perioperative outcomes were equivalent (p = 0.05). Application of the Filshie clip was rated easier than Pomeroy suture application and, overall, the Filshie clip sterilization procedure was rated less difficult (p = 0.03). Seventy percent of surgeons preferred the Filshie clip technique and would choose it if only one postpartum sterilization method was available.

CONCLUSION

For obstetric sterilization, surgeons preferred the Filshie clip over the Pomeroy technique. In addition, operating time was shorter for the Filshie clip. This pilot study suggests that use of the Filshie clip technique has the potential to establish a new standard of care for postpartum and intrapartum cesarean sterilization.

摘要

目的

通过开展一项随机试验,比较在美国一家教学医院中,产后及产时剖宫产绝育术采用菲尔希夹(Filshie clip)技术和波默罗伊(Pomeroy)技术在外科医生偏好及围手术期结局方面的差异。

方法

32名同意接受绝育术的产科患者被随机分为接受波默罗伊技术组或放置菲尔希夹组。手术结束后,外科医生和手术室技术人员完成了一项关于他们对手术的体验及偏好的调查。通过查阅病历获取患者人口统计学数据、手术时间及随访时间。

结果

对于大多数产后绝育术,菲尔希夹技术的平均手术时长快了近7分钟(p = 0.08);围手术期结局相当(p = 0.05)。菲尔希夹的应用被评为比波默罗伊缝合法更容易,总体而言,菲尔希夹绝育术被评为难度更低(p = 0.03)。70%的外科医生更喜欢菲尔希夹技术,并且如果只有一种产后绝育方法可用,他们会选择该技术。

结论

对于产科绝育术,外科医生更喜欢菲尔希夹技术而非波默罗伊技术。此外,菲尔希夹的手术时间更短。这项初步研究表明,使用菲尔希夹技术有可能为产后及产时剖宫产绝育术确立一种新的护理标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验