• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“免疫增强疗法(IAT)”的临床评估:一种非常规癌症治疗方法。

Clinical evaluation of "immunoaugmentative therapy (IAT)": an unconventional cancer treatment.

作者信息

Pfeifer Bernd L, Jonas Wayne B

机构信息

University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

Integr Cancer Ther. 2003 Jun;2(2):112-9. doi: 10.1177/1534735403002002003.

DOI:10.1177/1534735403002002003
PMID:15035898
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Immunoaugmentative therapy (IAT) is an unconventional therapy used by thousands of cancer patients that has not been systematically evaluated for safety and efficacy. The authors evaluated the toxicity and effects of this therapy in a series of consecutively treated cancer patients.

METHODS

A sample of 46 consecutive patients treated at the Immune Therapy Clinic in Playas, Mexico, from April to December 1989 were evaluated for adverse reactions, tumor response, quality of life and immune status over 12 weeks of IAT treatment. Patients' blood was tested for HIV and hepatitis B antibody before and after treatment. Histological confirmation of cancer and staging was obtained in all patients, and the results of follow-up radiological examinations were judged in a blinded fashion by independent diagnostic radiologists.

RESULTS

There were no signs of toxicity (SWOG criteria) and no HIV or hepatitis B conversion attributable to IAT. None of the 46 patients showed tumor regression. Forty patients (87%) had disease progression, and 25 (55%) died within 6 months from disease progression. Thirty-five patients (76%) noticed a decline in their quality of life during IAT. Thirty-eight patients (83%) opted to continue with the IAT treatment, despite its lack of effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

No indication of toxicity or effectiveness was found in an uncontrolled, consecutively selected series of 46 cancer patients undergoing IAT treatment. In addition, the therapy did not appear to contribute to improved quality of life in most patients. This study does not justify its continued use.

摘要

未标注

免疫增强疗法(IAT)是一种数千名癌症患者使用的非传统疗法,尚未对其安全性和有效性进行系统评估。作者评估了该疗法在一系列连续治疗的癌症患者中的毒性和效果。

方法

对1989年4月至12月在墨西哥普拉亚斯免疫治疗诊所连续治疗的46例患者样本,评估其在12周免疫增强疗法治疗期间的不良反应、肿瘤反应、生活质量和免疫状态。治疗前后检测患者血液中的HIV和乙肝抗体。所有患者均获得癌症的组织学确诊和分期,随访影像学检查结果由独立诊断放射科医生以盲法判断。

结果

没有毒性迹象(SWOG标准),也没有因免疫增强疗法导致的HIV或乙肝血清学转换。46例患者中无一例出现肿瘤消退。40例(87%)病情进展,25例(55%)在疾病进展后6个月内死亡。35例(76%)患者在免疫增强疗法期间生活质量下降。38例(83%)患者尽管该疗法无效仍选择继续接受免疫增强疗法治疗。

结论

在一组未经对照、连续入选的46例接受免疫增强疗法治疗的癌症患者中,未发现毒性或有效性迹象。此外,该疗法似乎并未使大多数患者的生活质量得到改善。本研究无法证明其继续使用的合理性。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of "immunoaugmentative therapy (IAT)": an unconventional cancer treatment.“免疫增强疗法(IAT)”的临床评估:一种非常规癌症治疗方法。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2003 Jun;2(2):112-9. doi: 10.1177/1534735403002002003.
2
Multiple dietary antioxidants enhance the efficacy of standard and experimental cancer therapies and decrease their toxicity.多种膳食抗氧化剂可提高标准癌症疗法和实验性癌症疗法的疗效,并降低其毒性。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2004 Dec;3(4):310-22. doi: 10.1177/1534735404270936.
3
Cancer outcomes at the Hufeland (complementary/alternative medicine) klinik: a best-case series review.胡费兰(补充/替代医学)诊所的癌症治疗结果:最佳病例系列回顾
Integr Cancer Ther. 2005 Jun;4(2):156-67. doi: 10.1177/1534735405275796.
4
Treatment of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor secreting, allogeneic, cellular immunotherapy.采用分泌粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子的异基因细胞免疫疗法治疗前列腺癌生化复发
J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):2011-7; discussion 2017-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.048. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
5
Review of the best case series methodology: best case series results of East-West Cancer Center.最佳病例系列方法学综述:东西方癌症中心的最佳病例系列结果
Integr Cancer Ther. 2008 Sep;7(3):182-8. doi: 10.1177/1534735408322844.
6
Preoperative hyperfractionated chemoradiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer in patients previously irradiated to the pelvis: A multicentric phase II study.术前超分割放化疗用于既往盆腔放疗后的局部复发性直肠癌患者:一项多中心II期研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Mar 15;64(4):1129-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.017. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
7
Supraglottic laryngeal cancer: analysis of treatment results.声门上型喉癌:治疗结果分析
Laryngoscope. 2005 Aug;115(8):1402-10. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000166896.67924.B7.
8
Adjuvant fractionated high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy after external beam radiotherapy in Tl and T2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma.T1和T2期鼻咽癌外照射放疗后辅助分次高剂量率腔内近距离放疗
Head Neck. 2004 May;26(5):389-95. doi: 10.1002/hed.10398.
9
Clinical benefits of epoetin alfa (Eprex) 10,000 units subcutaneously thrice weekly in Thai cancer patients with anemia receiving chemotherapy.对于接受化疗且患有贫血的泰国癌症患者,每周三次皮下注射10,000单位阿法依泊汀(益比奥)的临床益处。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 May;88(5):607-12.
10
Clinical outcome of tumor recurrence for Ta, T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer from the data on registered bladder cancer patients in Japan: 1999-2001 report from the Japanese Urological Association.根据日本登记膀胱癌患者的数据得出的Ta、T1期非肌层浸润性膀胱癌肿瘤复发的临床结果:日本泌尿外科学会1999 - 2001年报告
Int J Urol. 2009 Mar;16(3):279-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02235.x. Epub 2009 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Integrative Cancer Clinics With the Claim Assessment Profile: An Example With the InspireHealth Clinic.使用索赔评估概况评估综合癌症诊所:以InspireHealth诊所为例。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2018 Mar;17(1):106-114. doi: 10.1177/1534735416684017. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
2
Scientific Evaluation and Review of Claims in Health Care (SEaRCH): A Streamlined, Systematic, Phased Approach for Determining "What Works" in Healthcare.医疗保健领域声明的科学评估与审查(SEaRCH):一种用于确定医疗保健中“有效方法”的简化、系统、分阶段方法。
J Altern Complement Med. 2017 Jan;23(1):18-25. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0291. Epub 2016 Dec 27.