• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孤立性左前降支近端高级别病变:支架治疗还是非体外循环下左内乳动脉搭桥术?

Isolated high-grade lesion of the proximal LAD: a stent or off-pump LIMA?

作者信息

Drenth Derk J, Veeger Nic J G M, Grandjean Jan G, Mariani Massimo A, van Boven Ad J, Boonstra Piet W

机构信息

Thoraxcentre, Groningen University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Apr;25(4):567-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.015.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.015
PMID:15037273
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of patients with an isolated high-grade stenosis of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery randomized to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting (PCI, stenting) or to off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (surgery).

METHODS

Patients with an isolated high-grade stenosis (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification type B2/C) of the proximal LAD were randomly assigned to stenting (n=51) or to surgery (n=51) and were followed for 3-5 years (mean 4 years). Primary composite endpoint was freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke and repeat target vessel revascularization. Secondary endpoints were angina pectoris status and need for anti-anginal medication at follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat.

RESULTS

MACCEs occurred in 27.5% after stenting and 9.8% after surgery (P=0.02; absolute risk reduction 17.7%). Freedom from angina pectoris was 67% after stenting and 85% after surgery (P=0.036). Need for anti-anginal medication was significantly lower after surgery compared to stenting (P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Patients with an isolated high-grade lesion of the proximal LAD have a significantly better 4-year clinical outcome after off-pump coronary bypass grafting than after PCI.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较孤立性左前降支(LAD)冠状动脉重度狭窄患者随机接受经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术加支架置入术(PCI,支架置入术)或非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(手术)后的长期结局。

方法

将孤立性近端LAD重度狭窄(美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会分类为B2/C型)的患者随机分配至支架置入组(n = 51)或手术组(n = 51),并随访3至5年(平均4年)。主要复合终点是无主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE),包括心源性死亡、心肌梗死、中风和再次靶血管血运重建。次要终点是随访时的心绞痛状态和抗心绞痛药物需求。分析采用意向性治疗。

结果

支架置入术后MACCE发生率为27.5%,手术后为9.8%(P = 0.02;绝对风险降低17.7%)。支架置入术后无心绞痛的比例为67%,手术后为85%(P = 0.036)。与支架置入术相比,手术后抗心绞痛药物需求显著更低(P = 0.002)。

结论

孤立性近端LAD重度病变患者非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后4年的临床结局明显优于PCI术后。

相似文献

1
Isolated high-grade lesion of the proximal LAD: a stent or off-pump LIMA?孤立性左前降支近端高级别病变:支架治疗还是非体外循环下左内乳动脉搭桥术?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Apr;25(4):567-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.015.
2
Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery.左前降支冠状动脉狭窄的支架置入术与微创搭桥手术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 22;347(8):561-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013563.
3
10-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing bare-metal stenting with internal mammary artery grafting for proximal, isolated de novo left anterior coronary artery stenosis the SIMA (Stenting versus Internal Mammary Artery grafting) trial.一项比较裸金属支架置入术与乳内动脉搭桥术治疗近端孤立性初发左前冠状动脉狭窄的前瞻性随机试验的10年随访:SIMA(支架置入术与乳内动脉搭桥术)试验
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Sep 2;52(10):815-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.037.
4
A meta-analysis of randomized control trials comparing minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery.一项比较微创直接冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左前降支近端狭窄的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.01.018. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
5
Directional coronary atherectomy plus stent implantation vs. left internal mammary artery bypass grafting for isolated proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery.冠状动脉定向旋切术加支架植入术与左乳内动脉搭桥术治疗孤立性左前降支冠状动脉近端狭窄的比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Jan;64(1):45-52. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20214.
6
Randomized comparison of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery versus sirolimus-eluting stenting in isolated proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis.孤立性左前降支冠状动脉近端狭窄的微创直接冠状动脉搭桥手术与西罗莫司洗脱支架置入术的随机对照研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 23;53(25):2324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.032.
7
Primary direct stenting versus endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery--a prospective, randomised study.左前降支冠状动脉近端狭窄患者的直接支架置入术与内镜非创伤性冠状动脉搭桥手术——一项前瞻性随机研究
Kardiol Pol. 2004 Sep;61(9):253-61; discussion 262-4.
8
A prospective randomized trial comparing stenting with off-pump coronary surgery for high-grade stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: three-year follow-up.一项比较支架置入术与非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术治疗左前降支近端严重狭窄的前瞻性随机试验:三年随访
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Dec 4;40(11):1955-60. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02536-6.
9
Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention on proximal versus non-proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, proximal left circumflex, and proximal right coronary artery: a cross-sectional study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对左前降支近端与非近端、左旋支近端及右冠状动脉近端的疗效比较:一项横断面研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2007 Mar 4;7:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-7-7.
10
Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization.非保护左主干支架置入术与外科血运重建术的近期和远期疗效比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Feb 5;51(5):538-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.054.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term Incidence of Myocardial Infarction and Death After CABG and PCI for Isolated Left Anterior Descending Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.孤立性左前降支病变行冠状动脉旁路移植术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心肌梗死和死亡的长期发生率:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 May 19;2(4):100636. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100636. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.
2
Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass compared with percutaneous coronary intervention for left anterior descending artery disease: a meta-analysis.微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左前降支病变的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Aug 5;11(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13019-016-0512-1.
3
The practicing physician's current perspective on therapeutic options in coronary artery disease.
执业医师对冠状动脉疾病治疗选择的当前观点。
Neth Heart J. 2005 Aug;13(7-8):274-279.
4
Coronary artery bypass graft versus drug-eluting stent for high-risk proximal left anterior descending stenosis.冠状动脉搭桥术与药物洗脱支架治疗高危左前降支近端狭窄的比较
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2010 Jan;12(1):36-45. doi: 10.1007/s11936-009-0054-0.
5
Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention on proximal versus non-proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, proximal left circumflex, and proximal right coronary artery: a cross-sectional study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对左前降支近端与非近端、左旋支近端及右冠状动脉近端的疗效比较:一项横断面研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2007 Mar 4;7:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-7-7.
6
Hybrid coronary revascularization in high-risk patients.高危患者的杂交冠状动脉血运重建术。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2006;33(4):458-62.
7
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for people with stable angina or acute coronary syndromes.对于稳定型心绞痛或急性冠状动脉综合征患者,经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术加支架置入术与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD004588. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004588.pub3.