Jones D H, Winistorfer S C
University of Iowa College of Medicine.
Biotechniques. 1992 Apr;12(4):528-30, 532, 534-5.
Two simple methods for site-specific mutagenesis are described and compared. In each method, the PCR is used in two separate amplifications to mutate the site of interest and to add ends to one PCR product that are homologous to the ends of the other PCR product. In the first method, the two products are combined, denatured and reannealed prior to transformation of E. coli in order to form recombinant circles in vitro, while in the second method, the two linear products are co-transfected directly into E. coli without prior manipulation, resulting in transformation of E. coli with the recombinant of interest by recombination in vivo. Each PCR amplification uses a plasmid template that has been linearized by restriction enzyme digestion outside the region to be amplified. This permits use of unpurified PCR products in these two protocols and generation of the mutant of interest with no other enzymatic manipulation in vitro apart from PCR amplification. In each protocol greater than or equal to 50% of the resulting clones contained the mutation of interest without detected errors.
本文描述并比较了两种用于位点特异性诱变的简单方法。在每种方法中,PCR用于两个独立的扩增反应,以突变感兴趣的位点,并给一个PCR产物添加与另一个PCR产物末端同源的末端。在第一种方法中,将两个产物混合,在转化大肠杆菌之前进行变性和重新退火,以便在体外形成重组环;而在第二种方法中,两个线性产物无需预先处理直接共转染到大肠杆菌中,通过体内重组实现用感兴趣的重组体转化大肠杆菌。每个PCR扩增使用一个已通过在待扩增区域外进行限制性酶切线性化的质粒模板。这允许在这两种方案中使用未纯化的PCR产物,并且除了PCR扩增外,无需在体外进行其他酶促操作即可产生感兴趣的突变体。在每个方案中,大于或等于50%的所得克隆包含感兴趣的突变且未检测到错误。