Sciscione Anthony, Larkin Molly, O'Shea Anne, Pollock Marjorie, Hoffman Matthew, Colmorgen Garrett
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, Del, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;190(3):751-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.10.696.
The Foley catheter is a safe and effective form of preinduction cervical ripening and is quickly growing in popularity. Its major effect appears to be through mechanical dilation, which has raised the concern that the use of the Foley catheter for cervical ripening may damage the cervix and result in a higher rate of subsequent preterm birth.
We conducted a review of all induction of labor at our institution from July 1998 to July 2001 that required preinduction cervical ripening and had a subsequent birth. The primary outcome variable was preterm birth at <35 weeks of gestation. Demographic and potential confounding variables were analyzed. A probability value of <.05 was considered significant.
The cases of 126 women (63 women in the Foley group and 63 women in the prostaglandin group) were studied. Women in the prostaglandin group had a prostaglandin agent used. There was no difference in maternal age, gravidity, parity, Bishop score, total time of induction, gestational age, oxytocin use, maximum oxytocin level, tobacco or drug use, or type of delivery in the index pregnancy between the groups. In the subsequent pregnancies, there were no differences in maternal age, gravidity, parity, spontaneous abortions, terminations, cone or Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) procedures, history of cervical manipulation, tobacco or drug use, stillbirth, need for induction, mode of delivery, episiotomy, gestational age at delivery, Apgar scores, labor duration, use of oxytocin, or birth weight. There were no differences in preterm birth at 37, 35, or 32 weeks of gestation between the groups.
The use of the Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening does not appear to increase the risk of preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy.
弗利导尿管是引产术前宫颈成熟的一种安全有效的方式,且其受欢迎程度正在迅速上升。其主要作用似乎是通过机械扩张,这引发了人们对使用弗利导尿管进行宫颈成熟可能会损伤宫颈并导致后续早产率升高的担忧。
我们对1998年7月至2001年7月在我们机构进行的所有引产病例进行了回顾,这些引产需要引产术前宫颈成熟且随后分娩。主要结局变量是妊娠<35周时的早产。对人口统计学和潜在混杂变量进行了分析。概率值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
研究了126名女性的病例(弗利导尿管组63名女性,前列腺素组63名女性)。前列腺素组的女性使用了前列腺素制剂。两组之间在产妇年龄、孕次、产次、 Bishop评分、引产总时间、孕周、催产素使用情况、最大催产素水平、吸烟或吸毒情况以及本次妊娠的分娩方式方面没有差异。在后续妊娠中,两组之间在产妇年龄、孕次、产次、自然流产、终止妊娠、宫颈锥切术或环形电切术(LEEP)手术、宫颈操作史、吸烟或吸毒情况、死产、引产需求、分娩方式、会阴切开术、分娩时孕周、阿氏评分、产程、催产素使用情况或出生体重方面没有差异。两组在妊娠37周、35周或32周时的早产情况没有差异。
使用弗利导尿管进行引产术前宫颈成熟似乎不会增加后续妊娠早产的风险。