Guinn Debra A, Davies Jill K, Jones Richard O, Sullivan Lisa, Wolf Douglas
Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80204, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.039.
This study was undertaken to determine whether the addition of extra-amniotic saline infusion improves the efficacy of the Foley catheter in women undergoing cervical ripening and induction of labor with an unfavorable cervical examination.
One hundred consenting women with a Bishop score less than 5 with singleton gestation, intact membranes, vertex presentation, who required induction of labor were randomly assigned to 2 groups: Foley alone (Foley, n=49) or to the Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion (EASI, 30 mL of NS per hour infused through the distal port of the Foley, n=51). All women received concurrent dilute oxytocin infusion per protocol. The primary analysis was intent to treat. Nonparametric tests were used as indicated.
At randomization, the groups were well balanced for potential confounders including: parity, gestational age, prior cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, mean dilation, effacement, and Bishop score. There were no differences between the groups for time to delivery (Foley 17.7 +/- 10.5 hours vs EASI 17.4 +/- 11.7 hours, P=.9), the proportion of women delivered before 24 hours (Foley 41/49 [84%] vs EASI 39/51 [77%], P=.37) or cesarean rates (Foley 9/49 [17.7%] vs EASI 9/51 [18.4%], P=.92). There were also no differences in complications, including chorioamnionitis, endometritis, and neonatal morbidity.
EASI does not increase the efficacy of cervical ripening and induction of labor with a Foley catheter and concurrent oxytocin infusion.
本研究旨在确定对于宫颈检查结果不利、正在进行宫颈成熟和引产的女性,羊膜外生理盐水输注是否能提高 Foley 导尿管的疗效。
100 名符合条件的单胎妊娠、胎膜完整、头先露且 Bishop 评分小于 5 分、需要引产的女性被随机分为两组:单纯 Foley 导尿管组(Foley 组,n = 49)或接受羊膜外生理盐水输注的 Foley 导尿管组(EASI 组,每小时通过 Foley 导尿管远端端口输注 30 mL 生理盐水,n = 51)。所有女性均按照方案同时接受稀释缩宫素输注。主要分析采用意向性分析。根据需要使用非参数检验。
随机分组时,两组在潜在混杂因素方面平衡良好,这些因素包括:产次、孕周、既往剖宫产史、子痫前期、平均宫口扩张、宫颈消退情况以及 Bishop 评分。两组在分娩时间(Foley 组 17.7 ± 10.5 小时 vs EASI 组 17.4 ± 11.7 小时,P = 0.9)、24 小时内分娩的女性比例(Foley 组 41/49 [84%] vs EASI 组 39/51 [77%],P = 0.37)或剖宫产率(Foley 组 9/49 [17.7%] vs EASI 组 9/51 [18.4%],P = 0.92)方面均无差异。在并发症方面,包括绒毛膜羊膜炎、子宫内膜炎和新生儿发病率,两组也无差异。
EASI 联合 Foley 导尿管及缩宫素输注并不能提高宫颈成熟和引产的疗效。