Findeisen M, Vennemann M, Brinkmann B, Ortmann C, Röse I, Köpcke W, Jorch G, Bajanowski T
Study centre Studie Plötzlicher Säuglingstod, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Int J Legal Med. 2004 Jun;118(3):163-9. doi: 10.1007/s00414-004-0433-8. Epub 2004 Mar 24.
The German study on sudden infant death (GeSID) is a multi-centre case-control study aiming at the assessment of etiological factors and risk factors of SIDS. This report describes the study design and the methods applied and presents some general findings. Between 1998 and 2001, 455 cases of sudden and unexpected death of infants aged between 8 and 365 days were recruited into the study. The study comprised at least 11 out of the 16 German states with 18 centres involved. In 1999 and 2000, 75% of all SIDS cases registered with the Federal Office of Statistics (ICD 10/R95, n=384) in the study area were recruited into the study (n=286). A standardised autopsy including extended histology, microbiology, virology, toxicology and neuropathology investigations was carried out. Of the parents 82% (n=373) agreed to fill in an extensive questionnaire containing 120 questions reflecting all important aspects of the infant's development. For each SIDS case, the parents of three living control infants were interviewed. These controls were matched for age, gender and region (n=1,118). The response rate of the controls was 58.7%. Data were linked with medical records obtained from obstetrics departments, the children's hospitals, and general practitioners. Death scene investigation was performed in 4 study areas (cases: n=64, controls: n=191). All cases were classified into one of 4 categories using defined criteria: 7.3% of the children were assigned to category 1 (no pathological findings: SIDS), 61.1% to category 2 (minor findings: SIDS+), 20.4% to category 3 (severe findings: SIDS+) and 11.2% to category 4 (findings which explained the death: non-SIDS). In case conferences the previous history and circumstantial factors were included and an extended category (E-cat.) was defined. The consideration of these factors for the final classification is of great importance in the causal explanation of some cases. An analysis of 18 main variables in cases of categories 1-3 (SIDS) compared to the cases of category 4 (non-SIDS) showed significant differences for the sleeping position, coughing the day before death and breast-feeding indicating that the cases of both groups should be separated for further analyses.
德国婴儿猝死研究(GeSID)是一项多中心病例对照研究,旨在评估婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)的病因和风险因素。本报告描述了研究设计和所应用的方法,并呈现了一些一般性研究结果。1998年至2001年期间,455例年龄在8至365天之间的婴儿突然意外死亡病例被纳入该研究。该研究涵盖了德国16个州中的至少11个州,涉及18个中心。1999年和2000年,研究区域内联邦统计局登记的所有婴儿猝死综合征病例(国际疾病分类第10版/R95,n = 384)中有75%被纳入研究(n = 286)。进行了标准化尸检,包括扩展的组织学、微生物学、病毒学、毒理学和神经病理学检查。82%(n = 373)的父母同意填写一份包含120个问题的详尽问卷,这些问题反映了婴儿发育的所有重要方面。对于每例婴儿猝死综合征病例,对三名存活对照婴儿的父母进行了访谈。这些对照在年龄、性别和地区方面进行了匹配(n = 1,118)。对照的应答率为58.7%。数据与从产科、儿童医院和全科医生处获取的病历相关联。在4个研究区域进行了死亡现场调查(病例:n = 64,对照:n = 191)。所有病例根据既定标准被分为4类之一:7.3%的儿童被归为第1类(无病理发现:婴儿猝死综合征),61.1%归为第2类(轻微发现:婴儿猝死综合征+),20.4%归为第3类(严重发现:婴儿猝死综合征+),11.2%归为第4类(可解释死亡的发现:非婴儿猝死综合征)。在病例讨论会上纳入了既往病史和相关情况因素,并定义了一个扩展类别(E-cat.)。在对某些病例的因果解释中,在最终分类时考虑这些因素非常重要。对第1 - 3类(婴儿猝死综合征)病例与第4类(非婴儿猝死综合征)病例中的18个主要变量进行分析,结果显示在睡眠姿势、死亡前一天咳嗽和母乳喂养方面存在显著差异,这表明两组病例应分开进行进一步分析。