Gutiérrez Jorge L, Iribarne Oscar O
Departamento de Biología (FCEyN), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, B7600WAG Mar del Plata, Argentina.
Oecologia. 2004 May;139(4):572-82. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1533-3. Epub 2004 Mar 20.
Habitat structure is often assumed to be a predictor of habitat function. However, habitat structure may be insufficient to predict the functional significance of a habitat if the level of resources in the habitat is a consequence of the interaction between the habitat structure and physical or biological factors. In this study, we investigated whether depressions in tidal flat sediments generated by stout razor clams, Tagelus plebeius, affect the spatial patterns of pit digging by deposit-feeding burrowing crabs, Chasmagnathus granulata. The pits dug by crabs while feeding overlapped with clam siphon holes at a frequency higher than expected at random, and measurements of pit-digging by crabs integrated over several days indicated a higher frequency of feeding in the sediment of depressions. The daily frequency of pit-digging by crabs in depressions was positively related to the organic matter content of their sediments, but was significantly higher than the frequency of pit-digging away from clam siphon holes only after events of high bedload sediment transport, when the organic matter in the sediments of these depressions peaked. This example demonstrates the conditional nature of the relationship between habitat structure and function by illustrating how a physical process--bedload sediment transport--may introduce variation in the function that depressions play as feeding sites for burrowing crabs. Published information suggests that such conditional responses of organisms to habitat structure: (1) occur in a variety of habitats; (2) involve a variety of structures either of biotic or abiotic origin; and (3) are the consequence of either physical or biological controls that vary in importance according to the general mechanism through which habitat structure affect resources. This broad experimental evidence suggests that the accuracy of predictive models linking habitat structure and function can be improved by incorporating a mechanistic perspective that allows recognition of the potential for conditional responses of organisms to habitat structure.
栖息地结构通常被认为是栖息地功能的一个预测指标。然而,如果栖息地中的资源水平是栖息地结构与物理或生物因素相互作用的结果,那么栖息地结构可能不足以预测栖息地的功能重要性。在本研究中,我们调查了由强壮的竹蛏(Tagelus plebeius)在潮滩沉积物中形成的凹陷是否会影响沉积食性穴居蟹(颗粒厚蟹,Chasmagnathus granulata)挖掘洞穴的空间模式。螃蟹进食时挖掘的洞穴与蛤类的虹吸管孔重叠的频率高于随机预期,并且对螃蟹几天内挖掘洞穴情况的测量表明,凹陷沉积物中的进食频率更高。螃蟹在凹陷处挖掘洞穴的每日频率与沉积物中的有机质含量呈正相关,但仅在高推移质输沙事件后,这些凹陷沉积物中的有机质达到峰值时,才显著高于远离蛤类虹吸管孔处的挖掘频率。这个例子通过说明一个物理过程——推移质输沙——如何可能在凹陷作为穴居蟹觅食地点所起的功能中引入变化,展示了栖息地结构与功能之间关系的条件性。已发表的信息表明,生物体对栖息地结构的这种条件性反应:(1)发生在各种栖息地中;(2)涉及各种生物或非生物来源的结构;(3)是物理或生物控制的结果,其重要性根据栖息地结构影响资源的一般机制而有所不同。这一广泛的实验证据表明,通过纳入一种机制性观点,即能够认识到生物体对栖息地结构的条件性反应的可能性,可以提高将栖息地结构与功能联系起来的预测模型的准确性。