[Gastroesophageal reflux disease and chronic sinusitis].

BACKGROUND

It is increasingly suggested that there may be a connection between gastrooesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and chronic sinusitis. We therefore wished to establish whether the literature contains sufficient evidence to support this assumption.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a search in Medline (PubMed) and EMBASE with the key words "GERD, GER, reflux, sinusitis, chronic sinusitis". The literature obtained was assessed with regard to the reported results and their evidence levels. The level of evidence was classified according to the usual levels I - IV, only levels Ia or Ib being considered sufficient evidence for a knowledge gain confirmed by therapeutic trials.

RESULTS

A total of 77 references were found in Medline and 142 in EMBASE. A large number of these were narrative review articles addressing the connection between GERD or sinusitis and asthma or GERD or sinusitis and chronic cough. Only 12 papers and one case report dealt more or less directly with the question of a connection between chronic sinusitis and reflux. None of the studies could be classed as evidence level I (randomised controlled trials), ten were classed as level III studies, one as level IIb and one as level IV.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The existing studies do not allow us to pinpoint LPR (and even less so GERD) as a clear-cut factor in the aetiopathogenesis of chronic sinusitis. However, despite all their deficiencies and limitations the studies nevertheless do show that reflux into the pharynx and nasopharynx is possible. This reflux (= LPR) can lead to chronic inflammation which can be successfully treated with antireflux therapy with proton pump inhibitors. Quantification of the association is not currently possible. An above-average proportion of the patients with chronic rhinosinusitis appear to have GERD/LPR. However the prevalence of GERD in the population is generally high. It has not yet been established with sufficient certainty whether the LPR must be regarded as a causative factor, whether it exacerbates or chronifies the disease or whether it is merely an epi-phenomenon which does not require specific treatment. To answer this important question we need prospective randomised controlled studies which will provide evidence of sufficient quality. These should be conducted with the help of standardised documentation.