Heckmann J G, Stadter M, Dütsch M, Handschu R, Rauch C, Neundörfer B
Stroke Unit der Neurologischen Klinik, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004 Apr 2;129(14):731-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-821377.
Stroke care in Germany has substantially improved during the last decade. One column of modern stroke care is the institution of stroke unit which allows rapid diagnosis and treatment. The aspect of admission of nonstroke patients to a stroke unit is poorly evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the number of patients who are admitted to a national stroke unit but do not suffer from stroke. Furthermore, we related the proportion of nonstroke referrals to the different referral modes.
Observational study recording all suspected stroke referrals with regard to final diagnosis and type of referral during a 12-month period (1.8.2002-31.7.2003).
462 patients were admitted by 4 routes: 74 by paramedics or by self-presentation, 138 by emergency physicians, 144 by primary care doctors, and 106 were transferred from other hospitals. 88 patients (19 %) finally revealed no acute stroke. The most common nonstroke diagnoses were seizure (20 %), dissociative disorders (14 %), cranial nerve disorders (11 %), hypoglycaemia (8 %) and transient global amnesia (7 %). There was no significant difference among the proportion of nonstroke patients referred by ambulance paramedics and self-presentation (15 %), emergency physicians (21 %), primary care doctors (15 %) and interhospital transfer (24 %) [p = 0.222, X (2)-test according to Pearson].
Due to the fact that a number of clinical neurological conditions mimic acute stroke, misdiagnosis of stroke is common. We advocate that all stroke patients are seen early in the course of the disease by a neurologist. An alternative could be that in stroke units of internal medicine hospitals patients are seen by a consulting neurologist. Alternatively, telemedicine might be used and the neurologist on duty of a neurological stroke unit could be consulted.
在过去十年中,德国的中风护理有了显著改善。现代中风护理的一个支柱是中风单元的设立,它能实现快速诊断和治疗。非中风患者入住中风单元这一方面的评估较少。本研究的目的是评估入住国家中风单元但未患中风的患者数量。此外,我们将非中风转诊患者的比例与不同的转诊模式相关联。
观察性研究,记录了在12个月期间(2002年8月1日至2003年7月31日)所有疑似中风转诊患者的最终诊断和转诊类型。
462例患者通过4种途径入院:74例由护理人员或自行前来,138例由急诊医生转诊,144例由初级保健医生转诊,106例从其他医院转入。88例患者(19%)最终显示无急性中风。最常见的非中风诊断为癫痫(20%)、分离性障碍(14%)、颅神经疾病(11%)、低血糖(8%)和短暂性全面性遗忘(7%)。由救护人员和自行前来转诊的非中风患者比例(15%)、急诊医生转诊的比例(21%)、初级保健医生转诊的比例(15%)以及医院间转诊的比例(24%)之间无显著差异[p = 0.222,根据Pearson进行的X(2)检验]。
由于一些临床神经病症会模仿急性中风,中风的误诊很常见。我们主张所有中风患者在疾病早期由神经科医生诊治。另一种选择可能是在内科医院的中风单元由会诊神经科医生诊治患者。或者,可以使用远程医疗并咨询神经中风单元的值班神经科医生。